Which is better: RM 1.9.0 or mRatio 2.3.5?

[Sazzy]

mR it's not meant to be used while using another client at same time on the same tracker

I think his point here is that it could be usefull if it could be used while using another client. That's at least why I ended up switching to RM

[cheatos]

i don't hate adding uT
it was the first emulation mR ever had

oh I didn't know that, I joined the cheating scene on 6-2009 which is too late I guess.

mR it's not meant to be used while using another client at same time on the same tracker

Of course, but you can count that as a feature,
personally I (and I'm sure others do that as well) use RM to cheat the torrent from 0 to 100 and then leave it for days, either to avoid hit&run or for bonus points, So sometimes I might need to leech something using the real uTorrent.
but if mR didn't have the option then i need to stop everything in it then lanch the real client,
doesn't seem too bad but I still think its a good idea.
Also the source for the memory is open by RM author himself, its in RatioBlaster's sourcecode.(RB is open source).

i'm being able to generate correct ut peerids even before mR became public without memory read

Well then, since you're sure of it then I guess I don't have anything else to add

[ghostfucker]

2) closed source clients such as uTorrent(and its clone Bittorrent) are very hard to write a peer_id generator for,
so you might fall into length errors or uppercase characters or some special characters,
example: waffles can detect some faults in uTorrent announce and thats an instant ban for sure.

it's actually very easy, if you don't need to connect to real ut clients...

[The248]

I think his point here is that it could be usefull if it could be used while using another client. That's at least why I ended up switching to RM

Of course, but you can count that as a feature,
personally I (and I'm sure others do that as well) use RM to cheat the torrent from 0 to 100 and then leave it for days, either to avoid hit&run or for bonus points, So sometimes I might need to leech something using the real uTorrent.
but if mR didn't have the option then i need to stop everything in it then lanch the real client,
doesn't seem too bad but I still think its a good idea.
Also the source for the memory is open by RM author himself, its in RatioBlaster's sourcecode.(RB is open source).

You see the problem is RM is single torrent, while mR it's multi torrent.
If you do that with RM it's all fine if you that with mR it takes some draw backs.
The port issue for example, mR binds to a port but it would need to be the same as uT, you cannot bind 1 port to 2 different programs, for avoid detection every torrent on mR would had to have the same emulation, even on different trackers.
That kinda defeats mR propose right?
mR its intended to cheat alot of torrent with different emulations and different trackers all at the same time.

it's actually very easy, if you don't need to connect to real ut clients...

and why is that?

[cheatos]

You see the problem is RM is single torrent, while mR it's multi torrent.
If you do that with RM it's all fine if you that with mR it takes some draw backs.

Ok, I understand you right now, you mean that (doesn't suit mR).

The port issue for example, mR binds to a port but it would need to be the same as uT, you cannot bind 1 port to 2 different programs, for avoid detection every torrent on mR would had to have the same emulation, even on different trackers.

Yes right,
but since I've binded uTorrent to appear connectable you don't need to do it for mR as well,
but even if you implemented TCPListener for every single torrent , it will require a box to specify the port.(next to every torrent) which clutters the interface.

but you can forget the idea, it defeats mR purpose as you said, because if you done that, then mR will appear like multiple initialized RMs at the same time...

[The248]

Ok, I understand you right now, you mean that (doesn't suit mR).

Its all because of my bad english skills what i write in 2 lines you write in 3 words

[Dr.house]

RM with wm is very great than mRatio
as anon said mRatio have some problems should be fixed in the next version

[anon]

I'm using RM but, RM's client files not so up to date

You may want to check the RM 1.9.0 thread. I posted the latest uT and Vuze ones there.

[hellman]

and some latest emulations are available at moofdev forum too

[anon]

...which is down at the moment

[jacksbi]

Sorry but on the next version it won't have automatic features, yet. Mostly because i want to speed up the release i really want to release a new version in august but don't worry it will be added next time.

@the248: any news on the release?waiting for it curiously.

[saebrtooth]

I think every1 is waiting for it and will be "the next big thing" but we dont want to give The248 any pressure

Its cool as we can still use RM and works vnicely

[50 Cent]

I think every1 is waiting for it and will be "the next big thing" but we dont want to give The248 any pressure
Its cool as we can still use RM and works vnicely

100% agree man. still mRatio is clean and smooth on some trackers that i use of. The only problem is limited emulations and announce errors.
But you can bypass announce error by sticking with low speeds and using all the 20 slots. It'll be fine but We all love RM.

RM for the win but I've got the same love for mRatio too.

@the248 add more emulations and fix the announce error bug in the next release, after that mRatio == Ratio Master. Don't worry we'll love you software man.
Keep up the solid work!

When can i expect a fresh release of RM?

[anon]

When can i expect a fresh release of RM?

It doesn't look like it'll be any time soon. Mr. RatioMaster is quite busy with real life at the moment.

[The248]

@the248: any news on the release?waiting for it curiously.

I don't like to say "this day" because normally i miss it but im planing on releasing before the end of this month.

@the248 add more emulations and fix the announce error bug in the next release, after that mRatio == Ratio Master. Don't worry we'll love you software man.
Keep up the solid work!

There's a lot more going one
I just don't want to spoil it.