+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Windows 7 must avoid the marketing trap that Vista stumbled into

  1. #1
    Elite zatoicchi's Avatar
    Join Date
    26.11.07
    Location
    HERE
    P2P Client
    Faze Mod 0.2 Private
    Posts
    1,391
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 20/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss1391

    Windows 7 must avoid the marketing trap that Vista stumbled into

    I’ve been following the Engineering Windows 7 blog closely and I’ve come to the conclusion that while Steven Sinofsky is a man of many words, those words don’t say an awful lot. However, the other day Sinofsky did say something quite interesting:

    We heard lots on this forum about providing specific versions of Windows customized for different audiences, while we also heard quite a bit about the need to reduce the number of versions of Windows. However, there are limits to what we can provide and at the same time provide a reliable “platform” that customers and developers can count on and is robust and manageable for a broad set of customers. [emphasis added]

    This is the trap that Windows Vista fell into, thanks to marketing. Here you have an OS that comes in four retail flavors (Home Basic, Home Premium, Business and Ultimate), but the differences between these editions comes down to little more than arbitrary decisions made for the sake of marketing and being able to sell existing users an upgrade. For example, someone made the decision that home users were idiots and wouldn’t want a complete backup and restore feature, and that business users wouldn’t want to make DVDs. Given this, and what Sinofsky says about needing to provide a reliable platform, I really can’t understand how the Vista experience ended up being smeared over four editions.
    Windows 7 must avoid the marketing trap that Vista stumbled into | Hardware 2.0


    Don't walk in front of me, I may not follow. Don't walk behind me, I may not lead. Just walk beside me and be my friend.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  2. Who Said Thanks:

    shoulder (31.08.08)

  3. #2
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,731
    Activity Longevity
    12/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    2/5 ssss39731
    For example, someone made the decision that home users were idiots and wouldn’t want a complete backup and restore feature
    And that they would do just fine with 2 max half-open connections also
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  4. #3
    Retired Seal
    SealLion's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.05.08
    Location
    The Arctic--Believe it!!
    Posts
    2,079
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss2079
    Is that what was given for Vista users??

    for xp, it was around 50 or so before that one patch {forgot the URL of the website} allowed one to open the half open connections to 100 or more, yes??
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  5. #4
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,731
    Activity Longevity
    12/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    2/5 ssss39731
    Quote Originally Posted by SealLion View Post
    Is that what was given for Vista users??
    Yes. I don't know about other editions, but Vista Home has a maximum of 2 max half-open connections, and Vista Ultimate, 25.

    for xp, it was around 50 or so before that one patch {forgot the URL of the website} allowed one to open the half open connections to 100 or more, yes??
    The patch's URL is www.lvllord.de.
    In XP SP1 and below, the max half-open connections amount was unlimited, I think. But after SP2, they were limited to 10.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  6. #5

    Join Date
    22.05.08
    Location
    SB-RepubliC
    P2P Client
    SB Invention !!
    Posts
    2,899
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss2899
    I think MS should get over those silly mechandise based extensions that it makes with almost every OS it creates to the market,just to cash in loads of bux to feel that it served the human being in a way no one every done before
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  7. #6
    Retired Seal
    SealLion's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.05.08
    Location
    The Arctic--Believe it!!
    Posts
    2,079
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss2079
    Quote Originally Posted by Aurion View Post
    I think MS should get over those silly mechandise based extensions that it makes with almost every OS it creates to the market,just to cash in loads of bux to feel that it served the human being in a way no one every done before
    I LOL'd at this, Aurion. I really did.

    Especially this:
    ....just to cash in loads of bux to feel that it served the human being in a way no one every done before

    Interesting comment I would say.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  8. #7
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,731
    Activity Longevity
    12/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    2/5 ssss39731
    Well, hopefully so it'll be [for the better], don't you think, SealLion?
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  9. #8
    Retired Seal
    SealLion's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.05.08
    Location
    The Arctic--Believe it!!
    Posts
    2,079
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss2079
    Oh, boy. Yes I do.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  10. #9

    Join Date
    07.08.08
    Posts
    205
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss205
    It seems like most of the restrictions and limitations they put on different versions are to force users to upgrade. Microsoft needs to understand that using software as the hinge upon which to force users to upgrade is no longer a profitable business model.

    First, they need to understand is that their software is easily modified. It's the most used operating system on the face of the planet. It's not like they have a niche market or a small userbase that's not motivated. If it's not there or is lacking a feature, someone will find a way to add it to what they have without having to pay.

    Secondly, and most importantly is that you can't make arbitrary decisions to limit your operating systems functions in order to force people to upgrade. I understand that you feel you need differentiate the levels of the OS in order to wring as much money from legitimate users as possible--but please, don't slap is in the face while doing so. Limiting features people expect is not helping your business.

    There are other operating systems that are happy to provide full functionality for free. Upgrading from premium to ultimate? Here's some feelgood options and bright flashy moving desktop background to subdue you. Oh and if you spend more money we'll have one of the richest men in the world sign it. Who are the marketing people who thought this was a good idea? He's a rich man, not a rock star. The majority of people who your selling this to despise the absurdly rich. And the fact that the man who just served you a plate of O.S. B.S. signed the box is just a kick in the teeth.
    Last edited by Nobody; 03.09.08 at 08:55.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  11. Who Said Thanks:

    anon (03.09.08)

  12. #10

    Join Date
    22.05.08
    Location
    SB-RepubliC
    P2P Client
    SB Invention !!
    Posts
    2,899
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss2899
    @Nobody: this is the core of the Business term (if you are familiar with it) dude,just finding the easiest sneakiest ways to cash in real quick !!
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •