Well, that limits you to almost every general tracker on existence... anyway, while Pornolab is great, I can't recommend it in this context because they take longer to get new stuff (also, if you've never had an account, new users are limited to 5 torrent grabs per day). I'd start with PussyTorrents or Zamunda, both of which have open signups. Maybe find some hacked porn passes and upload their latest videos before others do.
"I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
was just reading luminance's code. besides the conventional detection of over speeding, about this "speed_zerocheats.php", am I misunderstanding or what? Is this anti-zerocheats code merely detecting tracker members whose accounts are in the initial state (0 downloaded and 500M uploaded) and are fake seeding now? that's all? Where's the code detecting ghostleeching and WM (if exists as #63 said)? not open source?
Also do you guys think is it safe to fake seeding with 0.9kB/s upload speed on mass torrents (with zero leechers) for a long time? (under the premise that the total uploaded is reasonable, eg torrent ratio does not exceed 0.1, and maybe using WM to be shown as 0kb/s in peerlist if necessary) generally speaking, not specifically on emp.
Look closer and you'll see that the amount of torrents the member has been a peer on and the amount of grabbed .torrent files are also considered This code is meant to find accounts whose behavior correlates with ghostleeching.
I wouldn't use that post as a reference for anything, since as I said before, "it's clear from their previous reply that they were completely unfamiliar with [the Waffles method] and likely got the steps wrong".Where's the code detecting ghostleeching and WM (if exists as #63 said)? not open source?
That's the slow and steady method, and it even worked on What.cd. The obvious downside is that you'll need to either be very patient or have many active torrents.Also do you guys think is it safe to fake seeding with 0.9kB/s upload speed on mass torrents (with zero leechers) for a long time? (under the premise that the total uploaded is reasonable, eg torrent ratio does not exceed 0.1, and maybe using WM to be shown as 0kb/s in peerlist if necessary) generally speaking, not specifically on emp.
"I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
Yeah, saw those two filters. If staff simply searches with these "the initial state + seeding status" filter, it will return bunch of invalid results, so coder seems add these two variables in order to reduce the noise (newbie members without using sites). staff can manually input these 2 variables to filter. but core search factor is still those two, which seems a bit disappointing if it's true ...... how can our fellows be idiot enough to mass ghostleeching but without downloading 1bit? when first saw the name "zero cheats", I thought it's for detecting "fake seeding with 0 up/down", which is super impressing if truly achieved.
Thanks, Would a normal client also behave this way (Report a small amount of uploaded even when there aren't any leechers)? seem to have seen this happened in my client, but not sure.
As I recall, last year or so there was an "operation" against some private trackers to download all of their stuff and archive it on external hosts, through massive ghostleeching on fresh accounts. I'm not sure if it affected EMP or how successful it was in the first place, but the stock source would have easily detected those accounts as they had zero traffic with hundreds of .torrent file grabs.
Also, this is open source code. If it doesn't do something you want or the way you want it, you can mod it so that it does
Under exceptional circumstances, negligible amounts of overhead traffic can be reported as upload, but this is very rare and definitely does not occur on a constant basis. The one thing that makes this method safe is the simple fact that 0.9 KB/s equates to ~3.16 MB per hour per torrent, which is extremely low and unlikely to get noticed even by automated scripts.Would a normal client also behave this way (Report a small amount of uploaded even when there aren't any leechers)?
"I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
be careful and safety first
Last edited by sashiagustina; 28.12.20 at 02:11.
Hi. I've been using mRatio for around two - three weeks now. I use it on HD-Torrents, FileList, TorrentLeech and IPTorrents. So far, i've had no issues. Never had a message by any moderator on any of the following sites. I'm not part of any of the holy grail torrenting sites like PTP, Empornium, GazelleGames, those type of sites. But i was thinking of joining Empornium. I've saw they're screenshots of rules and they say that they "Catch cheaters for sport everyday" and i'd like to know how accurate that statement is.
Has anyone used mRatio on Empornium before? And has anyone ever been caught and banned doing so? And if you do use mRatio on Empornium and haven't been caught, which upload/download speeds do you use, and which would you consider to be the safest to use? The sites i use don't seem to have very good security, especially TorrentLeech. And i think that's how i've never been caught. (I download around 15 - 20 torrents on each site and upload them all each at around 500kbps.) But because Empornium is a big very popular private tracker, i'd automatically assume they have very tight and very good security and would be good at catching cheaters.
(P.S my upload speed absolutely sucks, and mRatio is the only way i can survive on private trackers. And i'm too broke to buy VIP on Empornium, i don't really have a lot of money, otherwise i'd just pay for the VIP allowing me to get unlimited HnR's.)
You haven't joined EMP yet? That means you have plenty of time to read this thread and all the other documentation available in the forum
"I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
No, i've not joined yet. I'm not part of any of the big trackers like PassThePopcorn, GazelleGames, RED, those big ones. I'm only part of HD-Torrents, FileList, IPTorrents and TorrentLeech. I was wondering how strict Empornium's security is, and if they are good at catching cheaters. As they make a bold statement in their rules section saying they "Catch cheaters for sport every day." I just wanted to know how accurate that statement is.
I usually download around 20 - 30 torrents from each site and seed them at between 200 - 500 kbps each. Evenly spreading low upload speeds around all of them instead of having like 5 torrents going at high upload speeds increasing the chance of me getting caught. Do you have any experience with cheating on Empornium?
Never had to; you'll get far if you take advantage of freeleech and permaseeding and have a minimally decent upload speed (not sure what your definition of "absolutely sucks" is, mine would be "lower than 100 KB/s"). Uploading your own torrents is another possibility, as long as you follow their strict rules. Anyway, this thread proves cheating is not terribly difficult.
Also, I'm no longer a member, I just liked Pornolab more
"I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
Bookmarks