Originally Posted by
SealLion
How do you mean coincidence??
the 9/11 number gameplay - in europe 9-11 is 9th November
Code:
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2008/09/911-symbolism-in-hollywood.html
if the internet user is 'adult' enough to recognize and differenciate moral dilemmas, then I can't see this as being a problem.
if he is an adult there is no need (or justification thereof) for censorship
If the internet user is a younger user, then perhaps I could understand this.
in this case there is parental control
Your saying that the reasoning for not showing exploitative content on the internet is due to mechanisms that the internet nazis want others to follow, yes??
if one is an adult he has the freedom to choose whether he wants to watch or enjoy some sort of exploitative content (which is a broad term anyways) or not - no organization should have the prerogative authority (ie. censorship) over one's freedom of choice
as for the 'controllers' - they are just waiting for an opportunity to tighten their grip on one's freedom(s) and the best way to achieve this is to make one believe its in their own best interest to install such a control mechanism
Ok,... but
NOT having exploitative content on the internet is based part and parcel on social norms.
lets put it this way: if the persons engaging in exploitative acts (both the exploiter & the exploited) are adults & aware of their actions (consenting) then i see no reason for anyone to oppose to it, provided that it doesn't hurt 3rd parties (hurt feelings of some viewer don't count as they are free to 'switch the channel' so to speak)
so the question is: How does one protect the young internet user from disturbing images???
simple parental/school control programs for such content with transparent policies on what content is filtered (in the case of schools) - the same can be applied to internet caffe's or minor's computers/laptops
Bookmarks