+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 59

Thread: CCleaner

  1. #16
    Best tool ever, i give it 5 stars
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  2. #17
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,444
    Activity Longevity
    8/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    5/5 ssss39444
    very good, and FREE! :)

    make sure you always leave the "clean old prefetch data" box unticked at all times, it does more harm than good otherwise an excellent program
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  3. #18

    Join Date
    15.04.08
    P2P Client
    VEM
    Posts
    107
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss107
    CCleaner v2.07
    - Firefox 3.0 support added.
    - Fixed bug where figures were missing for KB/MB sizes.
    - Fixed bug where some IE cookies were being missed.
    - Improved scan time accuracy.
    - Internal memory management improvements.
    - Registry settings moved to HKCU\Software\Piriform\CCleaner.
    - Fixed bug where CC could get locked in System Tray.
    - Renamed MSN Messenger to Windows Live Messenger.
    - Added MS Office Picture Manager to applications.
    - Fixed uninstaller tool bug on 64-bit OS.
    - Minor GUI improvements.
    - Minor bug fixes.

    Download
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  4. #19

    Join Date
    13.05.08
    Posts
    35
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssssss35
    Hello,

    I only want to add that there are also 2 further versions are available:

    Portable --> No Installer
    Slim --> No Toolbar

    You can find them here --> Download --> other builds


    Also you can find an additional file in the forum.
    With it CCleaner can clean some more programs.

    It's available in the forum and you only need to copy the extracted winapp2.zip to your CCleaner-directory --> Add additional programs to CCleaner
    Last edited by arries; 14.05.08 at 11:12.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  5. Who Said Thanks:

    hitman (14.05.08)

  6. #20
    Elite zatoicchi's Avatar
    Join Date
    26.11.07
    Location
    HERE
    P2P Client
    Faze Mod 0.2 Private
    Posts
    1,391
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 20/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss1391
    very easy and simple to use..great software for cleaning your computer system.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  7. #21
    Elite zatoicchi's Avatar
    Join Date
    26.11.07
    Location
    HERE
    P2P Client
    Faze Mod 0.2 Private
    Posts
    1,391
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 20/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss1391
    New Version:

    v2.09.600
    --------------------------------------------
    - Added full support for Internet Explorer 8.0 beta.
    - Improved Opera 9.5 support to fix cache cleaning.
    - Improved interface for Startup tool.
    - Changed memory management routines to reduce footprint.
    - Fixed rare 64-bit performance issues.
    - Added splitter bar to interface.
    - Fixed repaint issues with certain themes.
    - Fixed Spybot cleaning detection.
    - Internal code optimizations.
    - Updated installer engine to fix icon bug.
    - Minor GUI tweaks.
    CCleaner - Download


    Don't walk in front of me, I may not follow. Don't walk behind me, I may not lead. Just walk beside me and be my friend.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  8. Who Said Thanks:

    hitman (08.07.08) , Aurion (08.07.08)

  9. #22
    toolboy22
    Version 2.10 is out... TuneUp is great, but this one is free!
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

  10. #23
    Retired Seal
    SealLion's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.05.08
    Location
    The Arctic--Believe it!!
    Posts
    2,079
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss2079
    ONe thing that I"ve discovered about CCleaner is that when one wants to use the 'wiping' component of the program, I find that its not as good as, lets say, Cyberscrub.

    Cyberscrub seems to genuinely wipe the data stored in various folders. Here's what I mean: When I wANT to wipe something 37 times over, for example, I just feel that it doesn't really do the job as good as Cyberscrub would, if I were to wipe something 37 times over.

    But then again, cyberscrub will also wipe the NTFS logs and the free space with random data.

    IDK....can't put my finger on it, but I just feel that Cyberscrub seems to do a better job of wiping any unwanted data from the computer. Maybe 'better job' is not the right phrase, perhaps, 'realistically' {sorry if my choice of descriptive words is not good this morning}.


    It does have more options available for wiping custom proggys as well.

    Whereas CCLeaner just doesn't seem to wipe data genuinely.

    overall, CCleaner isn't such a bad proggy though.

    I do appreciate that the program's authors are expanding the program to include more options to clean the registry, make cleaning that part better, including to clean other common and popular programs into ccleaner.


    But anyways...I just wanted to mention that about the 'wiping' component of ccleaner. Like I said. I just don't feel that it wipes as good as other wiping programs do.

    It just seems to wipe them too quickly, whereas, cyberscrub will take more time. For instance, wiping something 7 times should take an appropriate time as per the number of wiping times with random data.

    Ccleaner just doesn't seem to take an appropriate amount of time to wipe data.


    I mean, when wanting to wipe data, should the wiping process {as per the number of wiping times}, at least not take that much more appropriate time??

    Thats probably the best way for me to question the results or degree of effectiveness of the wiping component in CCLEANER vs cyberscrub.




    o



    o
    Last edited by SealLion; 10.08.08 at 16:26.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  11. #24
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,444
    Activity Longevity
    8/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    5/5 ssss39444
    CCleaner will wipe data with NUL (00 00 00...) passes every time (I think). This may be faster because it can command (well, maybe it tells the WinAPI to do this, which will then do it, but nvm) the disk to "fill sectors xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx with 00s", instead of having to "tell" it what every new byte will be, like you said Cyberscrub does, as it fills the space with random data.

    As regarding for "wiping the NTFS logs", I don't know if CCl does this, so that's a point in favor of Cyberscrub :)

    And yes, it is "better" that CS takes more time to wipe your stuff that CCl, because it's filling the empty space with random bytes: this makes it even harder to recover the data that was there than if it had done just 35 "null" passes (which already makes the process very difficult for software data recovery )
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  12. #25
    Retired Seal
    SealLion's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.05.08
    Location
    The Arctic--Believe it!!
    Posts
    2,079
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss2079
    Quote Originally Posted by anon View Post
    CCleaner will wipe data with NUL (00 00 00...) passes every time (I think). This may be faster because it can command (well, maybe it tells the WinAPI to do this, which will then do it, but nvm) the disk to "fill sectors xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx with 00s", instead of having to "tell" it what every new byte will be, like you said Cyberscrub does, as it fills the space with random data.
    This I wasn't aware of , Anon.

    I was under the impression that CCleaner just wipes the data with random numbers as CS would. INteresting info that I wasn't aware of. Perhaps this is the reason that CCL will take less time to do the job. Though I am still curious if it will erase data as effectively as CS would wࢠhile it is using NUL to wipe.





    o
    Last edited by SealLion; 10.08.08 at 21:22.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  13. #26
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,444
    Activity Longevity
    8/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    5/5 ssss39444
    Quote Originally Posted by SealLion View Post
    Though I am still curious if it will erase data as effectively as CS would while it is using NUL to wipe.
    Null passes: the more passes, the (even) harder it's to recover the data that was there. Can be detected, as it'll leave a big amount of 00s in a row, which for data recovery specialists is like reading "[a file was here but wiped]"

    Random passes: same as null passes, but if not impossible, it makes it very, very difficult to recover the data through software means (have to resort to hardware recovery that takes your HDD's magnetic plates, etc.). It also doesn't make it as obvious that there was something there, but I'm sure that if WinHex has a "simulate encrypted data" option to wipe files, it's because experts can "see through" random bytes and still tell something has been deleted.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  14. #27
    Retired Seal
    SealLion's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.05.08
    Location
    The Arctic--Believe it!!
    Posts
    2,079
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss2079
    I am going .to see if Winhex actually does what it states to do

    you can inspect and edit all kinds of files, recover deleted files or lost data from hard drives with corrupt file systems or from digital camera cards.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  15. #28
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,444
    Activity Longevity
    8/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    5/5 ssss39444
    It does (but you need a forensic or advanced licence to access the good stuff). Has even recovered a full partition I thought was lost forever for me, without any errors or corrupted files.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  16. #29
    Retired Seal
    SealLion's Avatar
    Join Date
    03.05.08
    Location
    The Arctic--Believe it!!
    Posts
    2,079
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss2079
    Wow!

    Maybe there's a crack or patch lying around somewhere. I'm gonna have to look around. This does sound like an interesting proggy, though
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  17. #30
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,444
    Activity Longevity
    8/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    5/5 ssss39444
    Quote Originally Posted by SealLion View Post
    Maybe there's a crack or patch lying around somewhere.
    Yea, but let's stop the crack discussion here.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •