+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: Why not go underground?

  1. #16
    Moderator
    Instab's Avatar
    Join Date
    17.09.09
    Posts
    6,645
    Activity Longevity
    6/20 17/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss6645
    Quote Originally Posted by anon View Post
    Ocelot, that was also a revolution.
    Quote Originally Posted by anon View Post
    Extreme high-performance code
    not at all. it was the second installment of gazelle's c++ tracker. and before that c/c++ based trackers were around, too.

    code wise it's quite bad. it looks like a first semester cs student's work who just finished his first textbook. no actual clue about what the code does. and the source code comments underline that. some would actually make for a nice joke if ... they were not serious.
    the performance is good enough because today even the cheapest server has a lot of juice. but it could be significantly better if somebody who actually knows what they're doing does a proper rewrite. from a performance point of view even the compilation instructions are bad and the used 3rd party libs are not a good choice either.
    Your account has been disabled.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  2. Who Said Thanks:

    Lucius (23.09.21)

  3. #17
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    37,601
    Activity Longevity
    10/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    3/5 ssss37601
    Still less worse than XBTT, so mission accomplished
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •