Hi everyone.
Found this on the interwebs recently. The news is from last month but still holds interest to a degree. Check it out.
There is this Syrian hactivist group called the SEA. They hacked Microsoft database and discovered some information that in some ways, isn't really much of a surprise since it's well known of the emerging police-states around different parts of the world. In my opinion, most notably here in Canada. The US too is on par I would opine.
But that's just my opinion.
Take it as it is.
Just that.
Regardless, according to the article the services that were hacked were only just 3. Read the article if you like. Link is at the bottom.
Anyways, if your a Windows user or even use services offered by the Redmond company, I would politely query what other services Microsoft has levied fees for of it's OS users ( and user services) to federal governments. And not just those law enforcement agencies of the US either.
Anyways, here's a small scoop:
and that's not all. There's a bit more of course detailing the fact that MS didn't comment, or rather dispersed on commenting on the fact they were hacked by said hacktivist group. Notice that fact is very quickly dispersed with one sentence. It's the 1st sentence that is relevant.Hacktivists apparently loyal to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad have bragged they hacked into Microsoft's internal system that bills US cops and feds for access to citizens' private data.
If read carefully, the SEA seems more interested in hacking/cracking accounts/details and so forth of government agencies, attaches, media outlets, military contractors, and corporations belonging to Western governments and countries of the Western Hemisphere. It doesn't seem to indicate interests of information in private individuals perhaps like you and me.We’ve previously stated that Microsoft won’t comment on the validity of any stolen emails or documents. Regarding law enforcement requests, there’s nothing unusual here. Under U.S. law, companies can seek reimbursement for costs associated with complying with valid legal orders for customer data
Anyways, the point is. Information about you is paid for.
There is much more of course at the link below. You'd have to read it to get the full grasp of it.
Also, if you use 2-step verification (which is a good idea in my opinion) pay attention to the 2nd last paragraph.
Bookmarks