+ Reply to Thread
Page 53 of 392 FirstFirst ... 343515253545563103153 ... LastLast
Results 781 to 795 of 5869

Thread: The Chat/Spam Thread

  1. #781
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,386
    Activity Longevity
    11/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    1/5 ssss39386
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  2. #782
    Advanced User
    yoco's Avatar
    Join Date
    23.02.08
    Location
    Slovenia
    P2P Client
    Azureus
    Posts
    7,977
    Activity Longevity
    6/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss7977
    Does anyone know of good software for scanning files? I have a HP printer/scanner/copy machine. I basicaly use an options that windows 7 provides, but I hate it. I loved the one in XP, where you could scan a file and then it would ask you to name it, and save it. In W7 it scans and asks you to name it, but instead of naming the file it creates a folder with that name, which I absolutely hate
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  3. #783
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,386
    Activity Longevity
    11/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    1/5 ssss39386
    VueScan is good.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  4. Who Said Thanks:

    yoco (08.10.14)

  5. #784
    Quote Originally Posted by anon View Post
    VueScan is good.
    The best for scanning.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  6. #785
    Advanced User
    yoco's Avatar
    Join Date
    23.02.08
    Location
    Slovenia
    P2P Client
    Azureus
    Posts
    7,977
    Activity Longevity
    6/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss7977
    I'll try it!
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  7. #786
    Can you believe this I am Hugh Grant, AMAA. : IAmA
    I know it has proof but still it seems unreal that a celebrity will waste time like this.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  8. #787
    This happens on a weekly basis though
    g̺̗͙̺l̜̜i͖̦͇̙t͕̲̜c͇̮͕̺̩͎̰̜h͕̦̘
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  9. #788


    Join Date
    22.06.08
    Location
    astral planes
    P2P Client
    sbi finest
    Posts
    3,125
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss3125
    Quote Originally Posted by Master Razor
    it seems unreal that a celebrity will waste time like this.
    its all a part of his job, getting in touch with the fans online, promoting a new movie, making the rounds,... trying to place a joke in every? single answer (his way of having fun?)

    Quote Originally Posted by hugh
    Heh. I'm having a lovely day, thank you. I'm being ferried around from studio to studio, doing interviews for this new film, and so far I haven't lost my temper.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  10. Who Said Thanks:

    Master Razor (12.10.14)

  11. #789
    It's funny that all cheating guides say always use no more than your real upload speed. If we can have 1GB/sec connections, a little weird to put 128MB/sec insn't it ?
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  12. #790
    Quote Originally Posted by Master Razor View Post
    It's funny that all cheating guides say always use no more than your real upload speed. If we can have 1GB/sec connections, a little weird to put 128MB/sec insn't it ?
    Except connection speed is often mostly theoretical. ISP's don't calculate in QoS and just sell it as xxxMB/s. My QoS is pretty good, so I actually hit my caps. A friend of mine has a different ISP with shitty QoS and is lucky to hit half of her cap on busy hours.


    Or did you mean it the other way around :) ?
    g̺̗͙̺l̜̜i͖̦͇̙t͕̲̜c͇̮͕̺̩͎̰̜h͕̦̘
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  13. #791
    128MB/sec is the theoretical speed but we also use PPPoE protocol and that slightly reduces the speed by approx. 8%-10%. Perhaps I forgot to mention that I already have it and confirm it.
    I don't think you guys have QoS, maybe just a speed limit. There would be no point to say: limit user X if user Y needs bandwidth.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  14. #792
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,386
    Activity Longevity
    11/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    1/5 ssss39386
    Quote Originally Posted by Master Razor View Post
    It's funny that all cheating guides say always use no more than your real upload speed. If we can have 1GB/sec connections
    ...then you don't cheat, because what would be the point?
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  15. #793
    Habbit. Anon man, you seem to be loosing your touch
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  16. #794
    Quote Originally Posted by Master Razor View Post
    128MB/sec is the theoretical speed but we also use PPPoE protocol and that slightly reduces the speed by approx. 8%-10%. Perhaps I forgot to mention that I already have it and confirm it.
    I don't think you guys have QoS, maybe just a speed limit. There would be no point to say: limit user X if user Y needs bandwidth.
    We do have QoS under the form of -> Limit user x's torrent traffic if user y wants to use non-torrent traffic.
    This has actually been confirmed by several users. (and has upset people that pay more for the extra bandwidth)



    And yeah, you meant the other way around, it seems, in your original post. Disregard my previous one :)

    Quote Originally Posted by anon View Post
    ...then you don't cheat, because what would be the point?
    Some countries have legal downloading. If you want to stay legal but maintain a ratio, you'll have to cheat ;-)
    It's probably better to just get a sabnzbd set up ready in that case. I've honestly been thinking about it, but it feels kind of retarded to pay for downloading. (since none of the money is going to the original makers anyway)
    g̺̗͙̺l̜̜i͖̦͇̙t͕̲̜c͇̮͕̺̩͎̰̜h͕̦̘
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  17. #795
    I didn't want to upset anyone here (if anyone feels this way, that is). I wanted to say that in Romania we have lots of bandwidth that we cannot do much with. Our government is permissive, no problems, but there isn't anything to do with a 1GB connection. Take me for example, I watch one movie a month so I consume a relatively low ammount of bandwidth.
    The actual reason for 1GB connection is that is very closely-priced to a 200MB or 100MB connection. If prices are very similar, why stick with a 100MB connection? That's what we all say.

    ...then you don't cheat, because what would be the point?
    There are some trackers that you just cannot get by without cheating, no matter of connection. A collegue of mine, romanian, got bitme.org and had to donate 10$ in order to keep the account alive. O month later, he barely uploaded 1GB. Agreed, it was the first high-lvl tracker he ever had so he didn't knew how things work...
    Aside from this, I'm really confortable with cheating. I love to do it and will always do it regardless of connection speeds.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

+ Reply to Thread
Page 53 of 392 FirstFirst ... 343515253545563103153 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •