RIAA Wants To Shutter Torrent Sites, And More

[ParamouR]

The RIAA has informed the U.S. government about the piracy-promoting websites it would like to be dealt with in the near future. The list includes all major torrent sites, but also Russia’s Facebook and Classmates equivalent. The submission is particularly sensitive because the House Judiciary Committee today discussed the pending Stop Online Piracy Act, which would grant copyright holders the power to put these sites out of business.

Leading up to today’s hearing in Washington, there has been a lot of talk about the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA).

Aside from making streaming of copyrighted content a felony, the pending bill aims to make it easier to put sites that facilitate copyright infringement out of business.

Should SOPA become law authorities and copyright holders will have a broad range of tools to censor sites they deem to be facilitating copyright infringement. Aside from domain seizures, they can demand that search engines remove ‘rogue sites’ from their results, order ISPs to block these domains, and cut off their payments providers.

One of the problems with the legislation is that the definition of such infringing sites is open to interpretation. Today we can reveal which sites are on the hit list of the RIAA, and it comes as no surprise that all the major BitTorrent sites are prominently featured.

The RIAA was kind enough to send TorrentFreak a copy of their latest overview of “notorious” websites that was sent to the Office of the US Trade Representative (the MPAA submitted theirs earlier). We were asked not to share the letter in full, but below is a rundown of some of the most prominent sites that are mentioned.

“RIAA members are excited about the potential of the internet and other communication technologies to provide an efficient means of distribution to music lovers globally. Regrettably, this potential remains largely unrealized—mired in a morass of piracy,” the letter addressed to the USTR reads.

The RIAA hopes that their list of sites will help the government to focus their anti-piracy efforts, and in a way it can be viewed as a priority “hit list” should SOPA become law. If it was up to the music group, this list would include all prominent BitTorrent sites.

“P2P file-sharing remains a huge problem for the record industry. BitTorrent, a P2P filesharing protocol, is responsible for approximately 50% of the industry’s global P2P piracy problem and in some international markets the figure is as high as 90%. BitTorrent sites and services, across the board, are high priority pirate markets,” the RIAA writes.

Based on visitor count, the number of pirated music files that are linked, and the sites’ failure to take steps to address the massive piracy problem, they arrive at the following list:

ThePirateBay.org
isoHunt.com
Torrentz.eu
BTjunkie.org
Kat.ph
Demonoid.me
Bitsnoop.com
TorrentReactor.net
TorrentHound.com
Monova.org
BTmon.com
Fenopy.eu
H33T.com
SUMOTorrent.com
LimeTorrents.com

Under SOPA, all the above domains could be put out of business without due process, the only requirement is that the Attorney General has to sign off on it.

Aside from BitTorrent sites the RIAA also wants cyberlockers such as Megaupload, Filesonic and 4shared to be dealt with, as well as the search engine FilesTube, and the forum Warez-BB.org. And there is more.

The RIAA points out that there are also several foreign sites that have copyright infringing “features” such as Russia’s main social networking site VKontakte and the Chinese search engine Sougou.

“In some sense, services such as Russia’s VKontakte and Odnoklassniki, and China’s Sougou and Xunlei are the most reprehensible of actors given that they want to appear as legitimate actors, and have functions unrelated to piracy, yet operate network services that include features that intentionally and effectively induce infringement,” the RIAA explains.

This last example shows that the definition of infringing sites can become very subjective down the line. It only requires a little creative writing to make half of the websites on the Internet appear as a rogue site, and thus eligible to be shut down.

Aside from the copyright issues, there is a broader international censorship issue at stake here. SOPA would grant U.S. authorities to seize the .com domains of Russia and China’s top tech companies with a strike of the pen. We doubt that these countries will be very pleased with that – just imagine how the U.S. would react if the opposite was true…

http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-wants-t...orrentfreak%29

pAR ~ Why don't they just turn the switch Off for the Internet and let's go back to stone age it seams logical does it not. Ach this is just silly get along with the Digital era.

That would mean war.

[hellman]

they can't f-ing do anything with thepiratebay.. thats for sure

hey check this too The Pirate Bay - The world's most resilient bittorrent site

[SealLion]

This is just another way for smaller groups of people to control the larger masses of people. It's not just economically and politically that the mass control of people in countries are being sought out for but also through communication mediums such as the internet.
Filesharing is a medium that can be construed to think of being as a medium that circumnavigates around the sought-for-control of communication mediums and the sharing of content and other information.

When you read above of the RIAA labeling sites considered to be rogue, they might be 'rogue' with respect to what legislation has been set up to legitimize other sites that are legal (again, within the context of what 's been legalized and so forth) and others that are not. This is true; however, when one looks a little deeper and more critically, one can see actions for control of communication mediums.

I feel it's not just piracy that is the basis of this issue. It is an issue for organizations such as the RIAA but such organizations are I feel a 'front' of sorts to limit, regulate, manipulate, or control other people. Regardless of their position or geographical location. Regulating the spread of information and communication via communication mediums such as filesharing over the internet is but one tangential arm to subjugate mass amounts of people to subservient roles.

[slikrapid]

which would grant copyright holders the power to put these sites out of business.

not if they are based outside of usa

RIAA members are excited about the potential of the internet and other communication technologies to provide an efficient means of distribution to music lovers globally. Regrettably, this potential remains largely unrealized

actually, torrenting & co. are pretty efficient ways of getting music

BitTorrent sites and services, across the board, are high priority pirate markets,

pirate markets? if its free you don't have a market

are the most reprehensible of actors given that they want to appear as legitimate actors, and have functions unrelated to piracy, yet operate network services that include features that intentionally and effectively induce infringement,” the RIAA explains.

somehow they forgot to mention google as the major player fitting this description

is but one tangential arm to subjugate mass amounts of people to subservient roles.

correction: to even more subservient roles than usual