TTC

[ciccio]

Secret trackers, secret topsites. Damn! All secret in this world!!

I was too curious to see how was made a topsite!

[CindyVer]

I wouldn't bother looking for it. You won't find it and even if you did, or get some more detailed info about it, you certainly won't get in.

Sometimes dreams don't come true

---------- Post added at 09:47 ---------- Previous post was at 09:44 ----------

Secret trackers, secret topsites. Damn! All secret in this world!!

I was too curious to see how was made a topsite!

Some things are better kept in the 'dark'. Some people value their security very high and trust must be earned.

I won't go into further detail but they will come for you and not the other way around.

[fakeking]

So,pal how many secret tracker are out there?

Could I know some, pal?. Just for my knowledge into tracker world (including url if posible)

thanks, pal.

[anon]

So,pal how many secret tracker are out there?

The question itself is a kind of contradiction

To satiate at least some of your curiosity, you may want to sort FST's WTO table by rarity level and see the reviews at the top. Peekinsi.de may also be a useful resource.

[CindyVer]

To satiate at least some of your curiosity, you may want to sort FST's WTO table by rarity level and see the reviews at the top. Peekinsi.de may also be a useful resource.

Even if you look at the WTO table and peekinsi.de there's still an uncountable amount of places that are hidden and not accessible.

Staring at fake homepages or knowing URL's from 'secret' places won't get you much satisfaction.

I suggest you concentrate on the places that most people know. Most of these super-duper-secret places are a big disappointment anyway, pal

[anon]

Even if you look at the WTO table and peekinsi.de there's still an uncountable amount of places that are hidden and not accessible.

Yes, of course. There are probably many places that haven't ever been mentioned there or elsewhere, because their userbase does a great job at keeping them secret.

Staring at fake homepages or knowing URL's from 'secret' places won't get you much satisfaction.

It satiates curiosity somewhat

[saebrtooth]

u really have to wonder why a tracker wants to keep small user base. low profile i can understand but with a small userbase how can they pay for their expenses unless they do it themselves

[anon]

Well, a smaller userbase already means you won't need an all-powerful server and Internet connection for it, which (when compared against bigger sites) cuts costs a lot.

Also, less users doesn't mean they won't donate if they value the place or simply want to help

[Blocker]

Well, a smaller userbase already means you won't need an all-powerful server and Internet connection for it, which (when compared against bigger sites) cuts costs a lot.

Also, less users doesn't mean they won't donate if they value the place or simply want to help

More Peers = More Fun

For example TL

I don't like trackers with a lack of users.Most of the time are inactive,few seeders and they have a passive community

[anon]

More Peers = More Fun

For example TL

= less security, for example TL.

[CindyVer]

= less security, for example TL.

Indeed, that is why I prefer the smaller ones.

No copyright-ISP-letters when using those smaller trackers :)

[saebrtooth]

That TL being infiltrated by copyright holders maybe its the same with any large tracker, and why wouldnt it be?

[anon]

That TL being infiltrated by copyright holders maybe its the same with any large tracker

Correct - the more users it has, the more chances there are some bad applies (i.e. anti-P2P companies) among them.

But if that isn't a problem for you, you benefit from better retention and maybe faster speeds.

[C3PO]

Copyright holders in TL? I've never heard about it...really?

[shoulder]

Yes, there was a an article on FSF I think some time ago.