How to reregister on trackers/hold multiple accounts

[anon]

I wonder why they'd wait three months with an (otherwise) excellent record before banning you again...

[SaintShaolin]

I wonder why they'd wait three months with an (otherwise) excellent record before banning you again...

Their scripts probably don't alert admins;
they found out later in the game, I suppose.

[deplome]

excuse me ,
but why is that ??

(Note it's recommended to use one between 49152 and 65535)

[anon]

The IANA defined that as a block of private or ephemeral ports, whereas the ones outside that block are associated to different services.

[Timmy]

EDITED by me.

[anon]

Maybe.

[redbluepen]

When I change the MAC adress, is there any possibilities of getting an IP that was already used?
If so, is there any software that logs the IPs?

[anon]

When I change the MAC adress, is there any possibilities of getting an IP that was already used?

Not usually. In most cases you'll get a different address.

If so, is there any software that logs the IPs?

History

[redbluepen]

Not usually. In most cases you'll get a different address.



History

But if I delete the cookies, the history dissapears... right?

[anon]

In that site, yes. Try not to delete them

---------- Post added at 16:21 ---------- Previous post was at 16:20 ----------

Note you can keep cookies for IP.cc only...

[AIucard]

I'll simply quote it: "certain connected trackers, such as TopHos, What.cd and x264, have been recently narrowing down on, and banning, SB-Innovation users. This is due to an abuse of some browsers' Cascading Style Sheet implementation, known as the "CSS Leak" for short. It basically consists on checking if someone has visited the SB-I board through a "hit and miss" principle. Even though some claim otherwise, knowing you've visited our cheater board is enough of an excuse for tracker admins to ban your accounts, which you don't want." Here's the link.

I took the test in ha.ckers.org
Result:

The following sites were visited: NONE

This has been fixed in firefox 5.0?

[anon]

I think Firefox has fixed this exploit (via preventing sites from checking visited links by default) for a long while now.

[MelvinMeow]

I don't think it actually is fixed by default. You have to turn it off manually to my knowledge.

[Instab]

I think Firefox has fixed this exploit (via preventing sites from checking visited links by default) for a long while now.

I don't think it actually is fixed by default. You have to turn it off manually to my knowledge.

According to the release notes it has been fixed a while ago but you can still disable it to be on the safe side.

[DukeTT]

I have a question regarding changing your IP (using this method).

I'm behind a home router (which I can easily bypass and connect my cable modem straight to my PC) and I get different IPs when I'm behind the router and when it's left out, but I mean completely different IPs and not just like last 4 digits.

If I run that batch while I have a direct PC-to-modem connection, will my both IPs change? (behind the router and direct connection to modem)
I thought that http://www.cmyip.com/ would report the same IP, no matter if I was behind the router or not.