+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 15 FirstFirst ... 412131415 LastLast
Results 196 to 210 of 223

Thread: CSS History Leak and how to prevent it even with enabled history [Firefox & Opera]

  1. #196

    Join Date
    04.05.10
    Location
    DaiViet
    P2P Client
    uTorrrent
    Posts
    170
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 17/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss170
    I'm using firefox 4RC too, I just feel tired because of using two browsers at the same time. Using NoScripts. I think it'll be fine :)
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  2. #197
    Advanced User The Shutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.07.10
    Location
    World With No Limits
    P2P Client
    WOW That's Private :P
    Posts
    965
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 17/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss965
    Quote Originally Posted by math View Post
    I tried this yesterday on Chrome (latest dev release), opera 11.01 and Firefox 4 RC :
    Chrome and Firefox Passed (The results showed none) , Opera Fail.
    Opera fails because the coders don't think this is a bug

    Quote Originally Posted by MiCRON View Post
    I was using Firefox 4 RC.
    yeah fixed in ff4 but it's still a beta so be careful
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  3. #198

    Join Date
    06.03.11
    Location
    Somewhere
    P2P Client
    utorrent,RM,mR
    Posts
    41
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 16/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssssss41
    I am using latest chrome in normal mode

    The folloving sites were visited:none

    So if this is what i get am I good to go with What and sb-i in the same browser?

    Just to doublecheck
    Last edited by @Freak; 13.03.11 at 14:44.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  4. #199
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,439
    Activity Longevity
    8/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    1/5 ssss39439
    Quote Originally Posted by The Shutter View Post
    Opera fails because the coders don't think this is a bug
    Technically, it isn't. It's a standard and perfectly valid CSS feature being abused. Private tabs will do in Opera.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  5. #200
    Advanced User The Shutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.07.10
    Location
    World With No Limits
    P2P Client
    WOW That's Private :P
    Posts
    965
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 17/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss965
    Quote Originally Posted by anon View Post
    Technically, it isn't. It's a standard and perfectly valid CSS feature being abused. Private tabs will do in Opera.
    If you read Microsoft or Google (don't remember really) Words About this , they said that this is invade of user's privacy (you have no rights to know what websites i opened ) calling it a bug so they fixed it in the new versions except opera who said that the coders only fix bugs not a feature .
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  6. #201
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,439
    Activity Longevity
    8/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    1/5 ssss39439
    I didn't say I didn't agree nor that the Opera team shouldn't change that. You think I like letting trackers know where I've been?

    The thing is, both whoever said that and the Opera guys are right. It is a privacy invasion that uses a standard CSS feature. It'd be nice if they did the same change as Firefox and Chrome, but as they see it there's no reason to do so.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  7. #202
    Advanced User The Shutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    04.07.10
    Location
    World With No Limits
    P2P Client
    WOW That's Private :P
    Posts
    965
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 17/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss965
    Quote Originally Posted by anon View Post
    I didn't say I didn't agree nor that the Opera team shouldn't change that. You think I like letting trackers know where I've been?

    The thing is, both whoever said that and the Opera guys are right. It is a privacy invasion that uses a standard CSS feature. It'd be nice if they did the same change as Firefox and Chrome, but as they see it there's no reason to do so.
    nor did i say that you like that , but i hope Opera will fix this issue soon
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  8. #203

    Join Date
    27.02.12
    P2P Client
    uTorrent
    Posts
    13
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 15/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssssss13
    Am I safe with Google Chrome as long as I just delete my history before visiting a tracker? Should I delete my cookies too?
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  9. #204

    Join Date
    24.11.11
    Location
    Beneath Darkness
    P2P Client
    eGhost v1.0
    Posts
    159
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 15/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss159
    I am a little confused after reading the whole thread. Am I right on the following?

    1. changing userContent.css can only solve PART of the problem;
    2. disabling layout.css.visited_links_enabled should work;
    3. using addon Noscript should be safe;
    4. Firefox 4 and above should be safe.

    For some reasons, I am still using Firefox 3.6. Also I feel Noscript is a little overkill. Does this mean that I have to use option 2 and lose the colouring feature for visited/unvisited links?
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  10. #205
    Moderator
    shoulder's Avatar
    Join Date
    12.04.08
    Location
    I*** D* M*****
    Posts
    4,827
    Activity Longevity
    3/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss4827
    Quote Originally Posted by bjs View Post
    1. changing userContent.css can only solve PART of the problem;
    This can only prevent the "real" CSS only leak.
    It can has some downsides though.


    Quote Originally Posted by bjs View Post
    2. disabling layout.css.visited_links_enabled should work;
    That one I'm not sure about, never used this option.

    Quote Originally Posted by bjs View Post
    3. using addon Noscript should be safe;
    Not alone, this only prevents the JS based leak.

    Quote Originally Posted by bjs View Post
    4. Firefox 4 and above should be safe.
    I don't know which version exactly fixed this leak, so I can't tell you for sure Firefox 4 fixed it.


    Quote Originally Posted by bjs View Post
    For some reasons, I am still using Firefox 3.6. Also I feel Noscript is a little overkill. Does this mean that I have to use option 2 and lose the colouring feature for visited/unvisited links?
    Yes, you need to combine NoScript and the custom css, or just disable your history globally.
    Also, using NoScript is always a good option.
    And yes, you'll lose the coloring feature.



    ------------------------------>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<------------------------------

    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  11. Who Said Thanks:

    bjs (05.04.12)

  12. #206
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,439
    Activity Longevity
    8/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    1/5 ssss39439
    Quote Originally Posted by blubbo View Post
    Am I safe with Google Chrome as long as I just delete my history before visiting a tracker? Should I delete my cookies too?
    Just use incognito mode for trackers, it's less mind-boggling.

    For the Firefox crowd, layout.css.visited_links_enabled=false is a catch-all solution. It prevents the leak at all times.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  13. Who Said Thanks:

    Instab (06.04.12) , shoulder (05.04.12) , bjs (05.04.12)

  14. #207

    Join Date
    28.04.11
    Posts
    533
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 16/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss533
    Quote Originally Posted by anon View Post
    Just use incognito mode for trackers, it's less mind-boggling.
    So it's safe to browse SB-I in a tab and w.cd in another one at the same time?
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  15. #208
    BrianBosworth's Avatar
    Join Date
    17.04.08
    Location
    Under The Radar
    P2P Client
    Bangladesh Extreme Mod
    Posts
    196
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss196
    Quote Originally Posted by THC View Post
    So it's safe to browse SB-I in a tab and w.cd in another one at the same time?


    Yes. Incognito Mode will work with any tracker(s).
    Last edited by BrianBosworth; 27.04.12 at 18:57.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  16. Who Said Thanks:

    THC (28.04.12)

  17. #209
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,439
    Activity Longevity
    8/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    1/5 ssss39439
    Quote Originally Posted by THC View Post
    So it's safe to browse SB-I in a tab and w.cd in another one at the same time?
    As long as at least one of those tabs is incognito, sure. And that way you don't need to worry about cookies and such, either. Once the window is closed, so are all traces.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  18. Who Said Thanks:

    THC (28.04.12)

  19. #210

    Join Date
    07.04.12
    Posts
    157
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 14/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss157
    FF12 and IE9 passed all test found in this thread, I guess this leak is fixed and no need to be afraid of running SB-I and trackers in same browser...
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  20. Who Said Thanks:

    Instab (28.04.12)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 15 FirstFirst ... 412131415 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •