HD-Bits.ro userbase probable crash

[anon]

"say hello to your sb-i friends for me"

Did you?

Still wondering how seeing me everywhere works for Anjow.

[alpacino]

Did you?

Still wondering how seeing me everywhere works for Anjow.

LOL, yes. It happened back then with my shortest account ever (less then 24h)! They chopped down the tree. The "root" was supposedly a sb-i member

[SealLion]

Who's Anjow??

[anon]

A What.cd staff member that's banned "anon" twice even though I only had one account there.

[SealLion]

I'm assuming that he thought that you and 'anon' were one and the same AND that you didn't use the same user name there as here??

In other words, he banned the wrong 'anon', yes??
Is that what you meant??

[anon]

No, he banned someone else from here under the excuse of being "a sb-innovation.de member, a moderator even - anon that is", and then me.

[SealLion]

my mind is twisted into confusin, anon.

He banned someone else from here, yes??
He banned someone from here who's a moderator
.....er.....your a moderator, yes??

Or are you talking about someone else from here who is a moderator here BUT he / she got banned at What??\

And then he banned you??

So how could the What moderator differentiate between you and the other guy who's also from here??

I don't get it.

Or did you used the same username here as there??
That's bad.

[anon]

So how could the What moderator differentiate between you and the other guy who's also from here??

He couldn't

I didn't use the same username.

A member from here got banned. When he went to their IRC channel, they said that was because of being me.

After I got banned, I went to their IRC, to be greeted with "hi anon". So have they banned "me" twice?

[SealLion]

Ah, ok. I get it now.
DOH!! (Homer Simpson immitation)

[Dynamic]

I think it is kind of nice to be famous Anon!

I mean to be famous one day!

You must have made them nervous to ban you 2 times.

[alpacino]

You must have made them nervous to ban you 2 times.

And that's what really matters, to piss off an arrogant tracker mod.
LOL

[SealLion]

I guess some mods and admins on some sites are arrogant. And haughty, too.

But that's just some, not all ofcourse.

I know that this discussion whas held elsewehre here in the forums too recently....about arrogance and haughtyness of some tracker staff.

KInd of reminds me of this user we used to have here who's banned now.
Hmmmm, just can't seem to place my fingertip on his name now....ah, yes..."Fingertip".
Arrogance and haughtyness at it;s best.
Right Stickbutt??

[anon]

I think it is kind of nice to be famous Anon!

Depends on which side you're on

Don't get me wrong, Anjow wasn't doing but his job by banning two cheaters. But the incident with my "doppelganger" is funny

[SealLion]

well you know it's their job to ban nasty cheaters like us, yes??

So now, that brings to question something.

Who's the real nasties here??

Us or them.
we're nasty cuz we leach 'n cheat like there's no tommorrow. Well, maybe some do.

and their a nasty crowd too b/c they are always begging for some coin.
And we don't really no where it's really being spent.
I"m sure that most sites do spend their donations appropriately.


Like you say, anon. It depends on which side your on and how you look at it.
One's perspective that is. YOu can't really blame these guys for ban-hamnering people to the ground. We cheat.

But do we deserve to be banned??

Some of us do seed back legitimately.
and of course, some of us hit and run when cheating.

I'll admit it. I have done that before in the past.

There's a variety of reasons why I entertained those actions. It's not all black and white, you know.

[alpacino]

Depends on which side you're on

Don't get me wrong, Anjow wasn't doing but his job by banning two cheaters. But the incident with my "doppelganger" is funny

Yes I know that, I don't know how I would feel if I were on their skin. But they hate sb-i so much, I don't think we are disrupting them. Are we?

---------- Post added at 02:28 ---------- Previous post was at 02:18 ----------

@SealLion: yes mate, I share some of your thoughts, but I don't mind being nasty on them, because they are wrong in the first place (in the eyes of the law I mean) for facilitating copyrighted material to be distributed without due participation of the original holders. And worst yet are those sysops that are profiting with their trackers. I remember reading somewhere an article about that, can't find it at the moment.