What do you guys think? Will it become anything without sharky? At least we have an archive of the posts thoughCode:http://filesharefreak.com/
Printable View
What do you guys think? Will it become anything without sharky? At least we have an archive of the posts thoughCode:http://filesharefreak.com/
Well they got it right with octopress.
:err:
There's one at filesharefreak.org with the original design.Quote:
Originally Posted by dickbutt123
Can anybody tell me what is/was so special about that blog. :P
AT the moment nothing .:memehappy:
that's gotta be a joke right? :PQuote:
Originally Posted by filesharefreak.com
if not then good luck to the site :lol:
Chrome is a good browser if you leave the privacy stuff aside. To the average non-obsessed user, I'd recomemnd either Opera or Iron.Quote:
Originally Posted by Instab
Quote:
Originally Posted by Instab
why is that? are there some privacy violations which can't be deactivated...?Quote:
Originally Posted by anon
i just switched to chrome and my privacy concerns aren't worser than on firefox. so tell me, waht is so evil about chrome (apart from that it's a google product =))?
SRWare Iron - The Browser of the FutureQuote:
Originally Posted by ghostfucker
oh really, what you said above already aside the options and configuration possibilities are a joke compared to the mozilla products.Quote:
Originally Posted by anon
you can deactivate them all. even the site states:Quote:
Originally Posted by Instab
Quote:
depending on the configuration
even better then, i wonder what purpose the iron project has thenQuote:
Originally Posted by ghostfucker
Of course Firefox will be more extensible, but Chrome isn't at the other side of the spectrum either. It also has a large selection of extensions. Also, it's undeniably faster. That was one of the reasons it gained popularity so quickly. Firefox isn't extremely slow (the Pale Moon fork on a SSE2 processor is very responsive), but Chrome's engine is always faster under the same hardware.Quote:
Originally Posted by Instab
The only things I didn't like when checking it out were having one process per extension and not being able to turn history off without a external hack. (I might have found other downsides if I had kept on using it, though.)
My main concern would be that you actually have to go and disable them. Otherwise, the default setup is happy to phone home if you do things like typing on the address bar. This is a ten-second thing for you and me because we know this, but for a less-experienced crowd it's not that obvious that Google is keeping record of what they want to find or which pages they couldn't load.Quote:
Originally Posted by ghostfucker
yes it's faster but how much? using a current firefox here loads the pages pretty much instantly. i see no sense in having speedups in valüs of miliseconds. also all that fading makes the usage very slow compared to mozilla where i have instant clicks.Quote:
Originally Posted by anon
the only reason why it's so popular is because of the google label :P
but it's been a while since i used it so i just downloaded the latest chrome (18) and installed it. a bit off topic but what the heck. here is the result:
what i miss:
- asking for cookies to be set
- disable image animations
- no separate proxy settings (system proxy settings are used)
- referer control
- detailed network settings
- and so much more - see below
i disabled all suspicious stuff i could find and of course all default google start pages and alike. it still tries to connect to:
- ssl.gstatic.com
- sb-ssl.google.com
- clients2.google.com
but what i absolutely can't live without is about:config. there's an about:flags but that's a joke compared to mozilla's about:config. that's why i meant the configuration possibilities are so poor unless it dös exist and i couldn't find it.
going through the prefs.js i have for the mozilla browsers and looking at all the changes and extra settings i have there all that is not possible with chrome (nor opera and don't even mention IE). but again unless there is something like about:config and i missed it.
Chrome all the way brahs.
without fsf news of new born torrent site has low traffic and less effective for almost all private trackers
And Filenetworks hasn't been updated since February. The reason I more or less know what's going on the BT world is because I'm a member here and on FST.Quote:
Originally Posted by sann
agreed but what happen to filenetworks?Quote:
Originally Posted by anon
I have no idea.
i say sharky dead ;):klatsch_3:Quote:
Originally Posted by anon