1. So then why does it change my base speed of the program? It is a bug then afterall?
Printable View
Lucius, newss ,, work now memory,,, now i will try upload ..
faulty torrent, I can't even open it in BEncode editor !
look at the log tab and you will find that error :
BitTorrent.IncompleteTorrentData: No internal torrent information
To simulate the real downloading or uploading process, and it's optional after all you can turn it off if you want.
There seems to be a problem with any torrent that I download from Torrentday whenever I use this tool. The tracker URL doesn't seem to be generated when I load the torrent. Torrents from all other trackers work fine, but not the torrents from TorrentDay for some strange reason. I had to copy the tracker URL from mratio (it works fine there) and paste it here to get it to work.
@ challenger15
I report that problem before and Lucius will fix at one of future versions .
:frown: Any similar apps for ubuntu user.
uTorrent_3.1.2 build 26773 Fixed.client
Attachment 15095
thanks for the effort
---------- Post Merged at 08:53 ---------- Previous Post was at 08:49 ----------
how come i still can't see password?
interestingly, the only thing wrong about his post is that the post did not meet your subjective expectations (Sazzy's neither, judging by her reaction) - you both expected him to figure out how to use the thanks button before asking for help - which he couldn't have done realistically (probably because of his inexperience regarding forum activities), as practically proven by his postQuote:
Originally Posted by anon
so those levels mentioned in the quote above are actually subjective levels (experienced user expectations) and they are theoretical
your own reply is also not wrong because it reflects your own thoughts on the subject - the reply may be viewed as an indirect hint at what should be done to solve the problem (become more experienced, figure it out on one's own, no need to ask for help regarding simple, basic things,...)
your reply might be viewed as wrong from someone else's subjective perspective which expected/wanted a direct reply or direct solution to the original problem (which is another kind of user expectation, also theoretical)
so, objectively, there is nothing wrong with either your own post or the original inexperienced post (both posts or events happened, thus they are right/adequate for that particular situation/conditions/acteurs), both posts reflected own subjective views of the situation
thats also what was meant by 'judging the world in our image' or 'projecting' - those posts were made from own subjective images of the situation, each having a different view of what actually is
thus the wrongness of anything can only arise from a difference or a mismatch between the subjective & objective view (regarding 1 viewer, each viewer individually) or from a collision of 2 different subjective views (2 viewers, regarding each other's view) AND when this difference is regarded as something wrong or unwanted or unexpected or negative
in other words, when something seems wrong, it means you're not seeing it right (!)
you're seeing it from your idea of what it should be, not for what it is
another interesting thing is that regardless of your reaction to it, the reaction is also always right (unless ofc, you have another subjective idea of what the right reaction is, when only that reaction will seem right)
another interesting thing is that regardless of your reaction to it, the reaction is also always right in your mind, even though you may not see things right! (since you only see subjectively)
in other words, whatever you do, you really can't go wrong (!), ie. there's really nothing to worry about (!) and this applies to both the inexperienced and experienced post (and to whatever the hell was this mindf*ck, posted by yours truly :P)
conclusion:
- both posts were objectively right, because both posts happened
- both posts were subjectively right, because both posts reflected own subjective views of the situation (2 subjective views)
- anything wrong with them? not objectively! only subjectively, by assigning the label ('wrong') to that which is different from your own subjective idea of 'right' and the negative connotation of that label
other variations:
- what if the original poster was trolling? he would still make the post because thats what trolls do, they troll
- what if the original poster was temporarily confused? he would still make the post because he was temporarily confused at the time of posting
- what if... ? he would still make the post (proven by the fact that he did make the post, we may only speculate on the reasons, not the outcome, if post-factum)
@ slikrapid
Answer the same question One hundred thousand of times is Normal for you !
Instead of that too long post without aim for the topic and the user answer his question .
hehe, didn't investigate that farQuote:
Originally Posted by anon
the conclusions still apply though
and thanks for taking the time to readQuote:
Originally Posted by anon
if 7 billion (and countless others) looking at the same elephant yet seeing somewhat different things is normal and natural, then what to say of my modest contributionQuote:
Originally Posted by mmmmm
0. inspired off topic posts may pass?Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmmm
1. y u no liek philosophy?
2. are you saying there's something wrong with my post? (get it?) ;)
3. don't worry about it
4. there are already several useful answers to the original inexperienced post(er) so far (can prove it too...) :P