https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity
Your cultivated wisdom is quite good because I don't remember anyone engaging with your holier-than-thou
attitude before.
The moment you do not understand something you force your mental framework on it until it sounds like something smart even if it doesn't make any sense like the fedora lord " you are not lord of your thoughts" nonsense which had nothing to do with the debate.
Way to go adding emotional value to the state of absent knowledge.all modern models are built on assumptions by research from a state of ignorance
Not true even according to your mindset. All modern models are based on earlier models and it has been so ever since the dawn of life. The "state of ignorance" you are referring does not exist and you probably re-purpose it for everything which doesn't fit your views.
Now this is called being charitable. For this part of your statement I assume that everything is true.whereas (sacred) scripture is produced by divine revelation from a state of knowledge
What people call divine revelation is most likely interpretation of divine revelation. The divine state of knowledge and the produced state of knowledge is no longer the same.How can you be sure of the validity of the interpretation if humans are corrupt and if they have more than enough to gain by claiming that they have received divine revelation ? ( sudden increase in status, better mates are just two which spring to mind )
as opposed to ?modern models have no capacity to go beyond the stage of theory that is hopefully good enough to roughly describe the materialistic world in a usable fashion
Where do you get your information? Because even though I like to think like that lately I've read a book and a few studies which suggest otherwise.how good these models are can be seen from the current disastrous and unhealthy situation in the world in virtually all fields of human activity, since it is mainly based on implementing and pushing such models
more like if that's the first internet chart you see on facebookmore like intentional and fairly professional boasting, due to being all fired up and assured of success
It's called commoditizing your complement. It's basic economics.major corporate involvement in linux development ought to be enough to raise anyone's brows,
Would you rather pay microsoft for every device you sell or invest a small sum of money into two developers which would make some patches that make the already encompassing linux kernel friendly with your device so you can pay microsoft nothing or whatever company is dominant in that field.
I do not know what you are talking about here.but if this is a situation like that of Thomas (christian 'slang'), no evidence will suffice
I asked you for one, one specific example of what you are talking about and you gave me a broad example which has its origins in your religious beliefs which I am supposed to engage with.further proof will be provided by the future, as we witness the results of such involvement
Look at this post only the last few lines are relevant to what we are actually talking about.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts
Bookmarks