View Poll Results: would you?

Voters
130. This poll is closed
  • Yes

    20 15.38%
  • No

    95 73.08%
  • Not sure

    15 11.54%
Closed Thread
Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011
Results 151 to 153 of 153

Thread: Would you pay for rapidshare?

  1. #151

    Join Date
    31.03.11
    Posts
    11
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 16/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssssss11
    Yes i actually do have a rapidshare account, and i will continue to pay to have it. The amount of content in rapidshare is immense.
    Thanks

  2. #152

    Join Date
    30.03.11
    Location
    Lithuania
    P2P Client
    Utorrent
    Posts
    6
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 16/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssssss6
    would pay for it if there would be no torrents
    Thanks

  3. #153

    Join Date
    18.12.07
    Location
    .:under your bed:.
    Posts
    296
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 20/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss296
    ask me 2 years ago and i'd have said yes - now? no.

    if you upload, http filehosting pays for itself. rapidshare used to offer awesome deals - i paid about 4 or 5 euros a couple of years ago for a short term rapidshare account (i cant remember if it was only for a week or a month), and the same account still has over a year remaining due to me converting the points from people downloading my files to account extensions.

    last year, rapidshare decided to screw over it's heavy users by binning it's points system. fileserve seems to have replaced them, once again providing lucrative lures to uploaders, so they're the one that a lot of people have switched to.

    ftps/usenet for the win though... torrenting/http sites are beneficial because you can profit from them, whether that be in currency or 'other' forms of payment.
    Thanks

Closed Thread
Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •