Agreed. It may look like there's a crackdown on Vuze just because a few (important) private trackers will ban it soon, but it's still the client of choice for millions of users on both public and other private sites. As a Java application it's cross-platform, meaning every OS there's a JRE available for can run it. And while its resource usage isn't the same as uTorrent's, BitComet's, etc., if you have a semi-decent computer with enough RAM, you shouldn't have any major inconveniences running it.
I'll say it - this would have been a major headache for us two years ago, when ghostfucker's spoof didn't exist, pretty much all ratio tools were buggy, and the only way for Azureus to pose as a different client was using the clientspoof by plugin, which gave you limited choices, sent faulty announces, and didn't work for peers, only for the tracker.
But we have advanced light-years since then. Look, switching to a "different" client is a matter of choosing its name and version below the Extreme Mod's spoof settings and restarting Azureus. Also, the RM sends flawless announces, and you can make it emulate anything via the respective client files.
A good point mentioned in this thread is how the Vuze developers may lose motivation if their client is increasingly banned from more sites - but hey, what was first? Private or public trackers? Should they stop coding a fully-featured BitTorrent client just because some sites don't allow it? They didn't when Shu made his mod of it, or DDJ took over and kept it updated without asking for donations to access "no upload" and "no download report to peers", or ghostfucker added his perfect spoof to precisely prevent this decision from having the major effect I mentioned above.
In short, people: nothing to worry about. I'd be more worried if public trackers banned Vuze
Bookmarks