Yeah but most tracker reviews don't have all from slikrapid's list...if we were to accept this template then we would have to delete all
Last edited by SBfreak; 25.05.09 at 00:31.
Yes, that's right. I meant for future ones
"I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
of course, my template is far from perfect, but with modifications it can be used as a broad (not definite or obligatory) guide on what a reviewer can add to his tracker review, as there are a lot of things that can be included
if the reviewer doesn't have some info, others can provide or correct it, same goes for current reviews - any additional info can be updated/corrected with new user posts
may i suggest something:
i saw that somewhere else and i like the idea.
how about making 2 or 3 screenshots of the torrentlist? one sorted by leechers one by seeders and maybe one by snatched.
that would help to get an impression on what's going on there and it would help from a cheater's view.
I always made the screenshot with torrents ordered by seeders.
I don't see the need for one sorted by leechers neither for the one sorted by snatches.
In what means?that would help to get an impression on what's going on there and it would help from a cheater's view.
How much leeching activity there can be on that particular tracker, I suppose. But all seeders were once leechers, and if there are a lot of them...In what means?
"I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
No need for that,every torrent with more than 20 leechers is good for cheatingHow much leeching activity there can be on that particular tracker
What if they're partial seed- oh, the Waffles method.
"I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
Bookmarks