Cheating on iptorrents?

[anon]

Set your listen ports somewhere between 49152 and 65535, and restart Azureus.

[alpacino]

It seems I wasn't banned after all, It was all just a confusion I made and later I got my original password reset.

So I can confirm the vanilla RM with memory read works there. :)

About the TCP listener, I am always using it and also in all instances of RM. Is it necessary to have it set in all instances if cheating on same tracker? Or just one is enough? The memory read fetches the port used, and clones it, so is it necessary to close the client before starting RM? Because all this time I leave both opened cheating on same port.

[anon]

It seems I wasn't banned after all, It was all just a confusion I made and later I got my original password reset.

So I can confirm the vanilla RM with memory read works there. :)

Great to hear

About the TCP listener, I am always using it and also in all instances of RM. Is it necessary to have it set in all instances if cheating on same tracker? Or just one is enough?

One should be enough, see below.

The memory read fetches the port used, and clones it, so is it necessary to close the client before starting RM?

Yes, because two apps can't use the same port. Or you could simply use another fake port in the RM and run both.

[alpacino]

Yes, because two apps can't use the same port. Or you could simply use another fake port in the RM and run both.

So that's the reason why I have this in logs:

Failed to open Tcp Listener: Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted

So, I've been cheating unconnectable all this time

And using different ports, would it arise suspicion?

[anon]

So that's the reason why I have this in logs:

Exactly.

So, I've been cheating unconnectable all this time

Not if at least one of the IPT instances was successfully using the TCP listener

And using different ports, would it arise suspicion?

On different torrents from the same tracker? Yes, because most modern BitTorrent clients only bind to one port.

[shoulder]

As most torrent clients use the same port for every torrent it could be suspicious if you use on each torrent a different port on the same tracker.

You could use BitTornado Emulation for example, it is able to use a different port for each torrent if I'm not mistaken.

[alpacino]

On different torrents from the same tracker? Yes, because most modern BitTorrent clients only bind to one port.

As most torrent clients use the same port for every torrent it could be suspicious if you use on each torrent a different port on the same tracker.

You could use BitTornado Emulation for example, it is able to use a different port for each torrent if I'm not mistaken.

I meant, using the real client with a fixed port, then using RM with a different port to cheat?

[anon]

Yes, that should be fine. Just don't load a torrent from the same tracker in the real client.

[raffav]

only for curiosity whicth is the best anti cheating private site ? which are known

[anon]

You mean the tracker with the best scripts? ScT is level 9 in the Ranklist. IPT is level 6, but according rajdeep their scripts are quite advanced, by not checking just your announces, but if you're using a real BitTorrent client.

[alpacino]

Also, worse than trackers scripts are watchful tracker staff.

[anon]

Like those at RevTT or KG. However, they can easily be bypassed by flashing if there aren't any automated scripts.

[douche99]

Flashing...always wondered what that means...
Is it slow low faking on the right torrents ???

[anon]

No, it is the exact opposite: faking at huge speeds (like 999999kB/s) for just seconds, or using the PMR.

---------- Post added at 19:33 ---------- Previous post was at 18:47 ----------

????? my last post deleted ????

Because it was spam...

[raffav]

ok sorry about that

i am faking on ipt and untill now no ban