Last edited by H265; 26.10.20 at 19:15.
8 predictions for the world in 2030
1. All products will have become services.Code:https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/8-predictions-for-the-world-in-2030/
this is basically the goal of communism, where masses of people called 'the proletariat' have no ownership of any item?I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes
mass surveillance in mega cities, where the majority of people will be forced to live in, surrounded by guarded and practically empty land areas, the goal of Agenda 21she mentions that her every move is tracked and outside the city live swathes of discontents, the ultimate depiction of a society split in two.
2. There is a global price on carbon.
manipulating fossil fuel prices and creating imaginary carbon offset taxes aim at keeping 3rd world countries from developing further and closing the gap to more developed countries of the west
3. US dominance is over. We have a handful of global powers.
there is no difference between a multi-polar world or a world under the dominance of a single superpower if all of them are under (or follow) the same globalist NWO leadership
4. Farewell hospital, hello home-spital.
the number of known, active or semi-active diseases is currently greater than ever, with no sign of any reduction whatsoever - the usage of medical procedures like vaccination or chemically manipulated toxins (found in medication, gmo, food, synthetics, plastics, etc.) are sources of new diseasesTechnology will have further disrupted disease,
disease is a part of the material world, it cannot be eliminated - the severity and incidence of disease in a society depends on upholding religious principles - even the pagans knew that and they tried worshiping various deities in order to keep diseases away or at least lessen their impact
5. We are eating much less meat.
the ancient Vedic culture is an example of a completely vegetarian society that has a continuation from times almost immemorial, whose spiritual concepts are unmatched in any other culture
meat eating is considered an obstacle for one's personal spiritual advancement and should therefore be avoided
6. Today?s Syrian refugees, 2030?s CEOs
people who end up being CEO's are usually privately schooled children of wealthy individuals, not some refugees
HAARP, chemtrails and other geoengineering technologies (weapons) can change weather conditions of a local area, forcing the inhabitants to migrate elsewhere, thus creating artificial exoduses and crisesas climate change will have displaced 1 billion people.
for example, the Iranian president blamed western forces (USA) for creating artificial droughts in Iran
7. The values that built the West will have been tested to breaking point.
the West was built upon Christian values, but as time passed by these were getting continuously attacked and disrupted by the forces of evil (personal and societal sinfulness, neglecting religious principles; by freemasons, zionists, occultists, atheists, the related ideologies, consumerism, hedonism, etc.)
8. ?By the 2030s, we'll be ready to move humans toward the Red Planet.
the Moon landings, Mars exploration and outer space exploration were/are staged events, they never actually happened - people are generally unable to exit our atmosphere or go beyond the Antarctic ring due to barriers placed upon this area of land (Earth) that we are inhabiting - advancements in CGI will be used to further continue this illusion of space travel, sell dreams and exploit gullible people in the world
every planet within our universe (including the Sun) is inhabited with various human or human-like inhabitants (higher civilizations)once we get there, we?ll probably discover evidence of alien life
our area of land (Earth) is surrounded by an even greater area of land, which is also inhabited with various human or human-like inhabitants (higher civilizations)
source: Vedic knowledge
other examples of meeting alien life may be: yogic practices, shamanism, out-of-body experiences, visions, possession, occult practices, etc.
more info on 'The Great Reset':
Klaus Schwab & His Great Fascist Reset
Code:https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/12/klaus-schwab-his-great-fascist-reset/
Last edited by slikrapid; 31.10.20 at 23:19.
https://thecommonsproject.org/commonpassOriginally Posted by DeadEndFred
CommonPass
For global travel and trade to return to pre-pandemic levels, travelers will need a secure and verifiable way to document their health status as they travel and cross borders. Countries will need to be able to trust that a traveller?s record of a COVID PCR test or vaccination administered in another country is valid. Countries will also need the flexibility to update their health screening entry requirements as the pandemic evolves and science progresses. Airlines, airports and other travel industry stakeholders will need the same.
The Commons Project together with The World Economic Forum is working to initiate the CommonPass framework to address those challenges.
How it works.
The CommonPass framework will allow individuals to access their lab results and vaccination records, and consent to have that information used to validate their COVID status without revealing any other underlying personal health information. Lab results and vaccination records can be accessed through existing health data systems, national or local registries or personal digital health records (Apple Health for iOS, CommonHealth for Android). Apple Health and CommonHealth let individuals store their health records securely and privately on their phones, entirely under their control.
The framework will assess whether the individual?s lab test results or vaccination records (1) come from a trusted source, and (2) satisfy the health screening requirements of the country they want to enter. The framework delivers a simple yes/no answer as to whether the individual meets the current entry criteria, but the underlying health information stays in the individual?s control. The framework is being designed such that it can be accessed directly through other apps and services.
Great Barrington Declaration
The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.
Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.
Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.
As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.
The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.
Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.
Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.
On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by:
Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.
Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.
Current Signature Count:
Concerned Citizens
617,785
Medical & Public Health Scientists
11,792
Medical practitioners
33,908
Code:https://gbdeclaration.org/
even though they criticize current measures, unfortunately they are still indoctrinated into believing that there is a need for childhood vaccination programs
there are old charts available which show how many of these diseases were already well declining for quite some time until any vaccination program was implemented, thus proving that vaccination was not the reason for the decline nor for the practical disappearance of some of them - likewise, every time a person receives a vaccine, he takes the risk of getting harmed by some of the numerous and dangerous side-effects of vaccines; not to mention other serious problems like: the constant inflation of the number of administered vaccines to an average person during their lifetime (currently at around 70-80 vaccines per lifetime, expected to rise up to 200 vaccines per lifetime in the near future) or the absence of liability for pharma companies concerning the safety of their products, etc. - anyone who decides to take a vaccine these days is foolishly playing with their health
what they forget to emphasize is protecting the freedom to choose whether you want to participate in such protection programs or notAdopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19
immunity can be easily transferred by using Type-1 Interferon on a weekly basis until the main wave of an infectious disease goes away [source: Dr. Judy Mikovits]nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors.
PCR testing ought to be abandoned, as this so-called test is worthless for diagnostic purposes, it is unable to determine the presence of a virus and therefore cannot be used to justify any kind of pandemic measures - the class action lawsuit being prepared by the legal team around Dr. Reiner Fuellmich will focus on glaring flaws of the PCR test in the attempt to show how numerous people were harmed by the invoked measures based solely on this test, which was recommended by the WHO to be used all over the world
watching trailers like these is not that funny any more, once you consider that governments around the world are seriously preparing for such events
just as pandemic outbreak scenarios were prepared and simulated in advance (Event 201, Lock Step Scenario, etc.), so the legal loopholes got prepared in advance to go hand in hand with the plans
these criminals need to be brought to justice ASAP before they take this to the next level (of insanity)
this book was briefly mentioned in another thread:
[english] Karina Reiss; Sucharit Bhakdi: Corona, False Alarm?: Facts and Figures (2020)
[german] Sucharit Bhakdi; Karina Reiss: Corona Fehlalarm? Zahlen, Daten und Hintergründe (2020)
pdf/epub downloadable at libgen (.rs)
Contents
1. Preface
•How everything started
•Coronaviruses: the basics
•China: the dread threat emerges
2. How dangerous is the new “killer” virus?
•Compared to conventional coronaviruses
•Regarding the number of deaths
•How does the new coronavirus compare with influenza viruses?
•The situation in Italy, Spain, England and the USA
3. Corona-situation in Germany
•The German narrative
•The pandemic is declared
•Nationwide lockdown
•April 2020: no reason to prolong the lockdown
•The lockdown is extended
•Mandatory masks
•Last argument for extension of lockdown: the impending second wave?
•Relaxing the restrictions with the emergency brake applied
4. Too much? Too little? What happened?
•Overburdened hospitals
•Shortage of ventilators?
•Were the measures appropriate?
•What did the government do right?
•What did the government do wrong?
•What should our government have done?
5. Collateral damage
•Economic consequences
•Disruption of medical care
•Drugs and suicide
•Heart attack and stroke
•Other ailments
•Further consequences for the elderly
•Innocent and vulnerable: our children
•Consequences for the world’s poorest
6. Did other countries fare better – Sweden as a role model?
• Are there benefits of lockdown measures?
• So which measures would have actually been correct?
7. Is vaccination the universal remedy?
•On the question of immunity against COVID-19
•To vaccinate or not to vaccinate, that is the question
•Pandemic or no pandemic – the role of the WHO
8. Failure of the public media
•Where was truthful information to be found?
•Where was the open discussion?
•The numbers game
•Defamation and discrediting
•Censorship of opinions
•The German “good citizen” and the failure of politics
•Why did our politicians fail?
9. Quo vadis?
10. A farewell
Respiratory viruses are a major cause of mortality worldwide, with an
estimated 2–3 million deaths annually. Many viruses including influenza A
viruses, rhinoviruses, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza
viruses, adenoviruses and coronaviruses are responsible. Now, a new
member has joined the list. As with the others, the SARS-CoV-2 virus
particularly endangers the elderly with serious pre-existing conditions.
Depending on the country and region, 0.02 to 0.4% of these infections are
fatal, which is comparable to a seasonal flu. SARS-CoV-2 therefore must
not be assigned any special significance as a respiratory pathogen.
The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak was never an epidemic of national concern.
Implementing the exceptional regulations of the Infection Protection Act
were and still are unfounded. In mid-April 2020, it was entirely evident that
the epidemic was coming to an end and that the inappropriate preventive
measures were causing irreparable collateral damage in all walks of life.
Yet, the government continues its destructive crusade against the spook
virus, thereby utterly disregarding the fundaments of true democracy.
And as you read these lines, human experiments are underway with
gene-based vaccines whose ominous dangers have never been revealed to
the thousands of unknowing volunteers.
We are bearing witness to the downfall and destruction of our heritage,
to the end of the age of enlightenment.
May this little book awaken homo sapiens of this earth to rise and live
up to their name. And put an end to this senseless self-destruction.
11. References
About the Authors
here are the aforementioned charts (.pdf also available):
Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics
This is the data the drug industry do not want you to see. Here 2 centuries of UK, USA and Australian official death statistics show conclusively and scientifically modern medicine is not responsible for and played little part in substantially improved life expectancy and survival from disease in western economies.
The main advances in combating disease over 200 years have been better food and clean drinking water. Improved sanitation, less overcrowded and better living conditions also contribute.
The success of the City of Leicester, England was remarkable in reducing smallpox mortality substantially compared to the rest of England and other countries by abandoning vaccination between 1882 and 1908
Typhoid and Scarlet Fever vanished without vaccines but with clean water, better nutrition, sanitation and living conditions
Contents
•Scurvy Mortality
•Typhoid & Scarlet Fever – Mortality UK, USA & Australia
•Measles Mortality UK & USA
•Mumps Mortality – England & Wales
•Rubella Mortality – England and Wales
•Mortality, Life Expectancy, Healthcare Costs UK, USA and Worldwide
•Mortality USA and UK
•Disease Mortality UK, USA & Australia
•Mortality Measles, Scarlet Fever, Whooping Cough, Typhoid, Diphtheria, Influenza, Pneumonia & Tuberculosis
•Diphtheria Mortality – England, USA & Australia
•Whooping Cough (Pertussis) Mortality Rates – UK, USA & Australia
•Tetanus Mortality – England & Wales 1901 to 1999
•Smallpox Mortality – UK, USA & Sweden
Leicester & Smallpox
•Extracts From “Leicester: Sanitation Versus Vaccination” by J.T. Biggs J.P.
•Table 21. – Smallpox Fatality Rates Compared with “Unprotected” Leicester – 1860 to 1908.
•Table 29. Small-pox Epidemics – Cost and Fatality Rates Compared
Code:https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/ https://childhealthsafety.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/vaccines-did-not-save-us-e28093-2-centuries-of-official-statistics.pdf
for included charts and references see the .pdf link below
1| P a g e
October 26, 2020
To: Michael Fuller
Police Commissioner of New South Wales
RE: Open Letter Concerning the Police Enforcement of ongoing COVID-19 restrictions
We are writing to you to raise concerns we have about the use of the police to enforce the ongoing restrictions placed upon our citizens relating to COVID-19, which has seriously eroded community trust in our great police force.
Since the Attorney General Declared a State of Emergency for the novel coronavirus, our governments have acted upon certain powers to impose restrictions on its citizens, using the police to enforce their rules.
Due to the novel nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, most people concurred that certain restrictions should be followed, until more was learnt about the virus.
With the initial modelling from the Imperial College in the UK [1] and the Peter Doherty Institute here in Australia, indicating a catastrophic number of cases that would severely burden our hospital system and could result in up to150,000 Australian deaths[2], it is easy to comprehend why our governments would respond as they did and why the vast population would comply.
With these frightening projections it became evident that we needed to find a way to quickly diagnose the disease. Yet the Centre for Disease Control in the US states that “no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available”.[3] So even without the virus being isolated, the RT PCR test was picked to become the gold standard for testing.
We note that the modelling was later found to have serious calculation errors,such that experts who later reviewed it have said "no serious scientist gives (it) any validity".[4, 5] And now the RT PCR test has been proven to be unreliable at best, with the inventor stating it should “never be used to diagnose infectious disease”, because it cannot tell if what it detected is alive or dead. [6, 7, 8] This test is still being relied upon to make critical decisions in the interest of public health and safety.
In the same way we cannot use an inaccurate speed detection device to proctor a civilian’s speed, the same must be demanded of a faulty RT PCR test and as such, police should not in any way mandate testing for covid-19, or rely on any outcome of the results.
Now that we have almost 12 months of statistical data that can be relied upon,in place of flawed computer modelling, these statistics show a reality that is far from the modelling projections, which were relied upon by National Cabinet in their response.
2| P a g e
For example, we now know that around 45% of people who contract the virus are asymptomatic[9] and asymptomatic transmission is between 0-2.2%[10]. We also know that 80% of people who contract the virus will only have mild symptoms [11] and it is overwhelmingly the elderly and immunocompromised who are at risk of severe symptoms that could result in death. [12]
At the time of writing, the world-wide survival rate for covid-19 is 97.3%.[13] The ordinary flu is 99.9%.[14]
Furthermore, statistics clearly show that while the confirmed cases may be on the rise, the percentage of deaths is plummeting.
Here are some statistics which reflect this reality: -
3| P a g e
Sweden and Taiwan did not enforce lockdown on its citizens like much of the world did. Although Sweden failed to take better precautions to protect the elderly in the early stages, their death rate is comparable,and Taiwan’s is outstanding: -
The statistics show there is a high infection rate across the globe, but very low deaths; regardless of whether there was forced lockdowns or not. What we can derive from analysis of this is that these two distinctly different ways have resulted in much the same outcome.
4| P a g e
We note from the recent Federal budget,huge debt and unemployment,is that our lockdowns have created a series of problems that now seem to outweigh the threat this virus poses. In our line of work,we know that the socioeconomical problems created here will transpire into a greater threat down the track, as people struggle to deal with the collateral damage this is causing.
We have been told that the advice from the World Health Organization is a key aspect to the National Cabinet response, yet Dr David Nabarro of the WHO recently stated “We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,”[15]
So in spite of the facts, as they stand now, it would appear that the National Cabinet has been lagging in its capacity to adapt to the reality of the situation and this is causing them to fail in their duty to respond in proportion to the risk. The risk being overwhelmingly with the elderly and immunocompromised. [16, 17, 18]
What is even more concerning is the prohibition on prescribing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19[19],when over 121peer reviewed scientific studies have shown it to be effective in treating and preventing the disease[20, 21, 22]. Instead,the federal government has done a vaccine deal with AstraZeneca[23] and Australians told we cannot expect to go back to normal until a vaccine arrives.
AstraZeneca has been found guilty of offences relating to off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products, making false claims,kickbacks and bribery,consumer protection violation, healthcare offences, government-contracting violations and more. Since 2000 they have been fined over US$1.1billion dollars for these offences and violations.[24]Still, they have been granted protection from future product liability claims relating to its COVID-19 vaccine[25].
Alarmingly,Prime Minister Scott Morrison stated they will make the vaccine “as mandatory as you can possibly make it”[26], in spite of the criminal record of its producer, their exemption from liability claims, the fact we already have at least two approved and extremely safe medications in Ivermectin[27]and hydroxychloroquine; shown to be effective treatments and the reality that the virus does not pose a serious threat to the healthy. It seems these decisions appear to be corporate interests, not in the best interests of public health and wellbeing as is claimed.
All this indicates that the ongoing restrictions on the healthy population is a disproportionate response, yet the police are still expected to continue to enforce these measures and at risk of being forced to vaccinate against a disease that is showing not to be virulent, with a vaccine that has had no long-term safety studies and then forcing it upon the population. The evidence would suggest resources are better directed to protect the vulnerable.
We are concerned with the legitimacy of the actions we are being told to take against the citizens of Australia. States and territories cannot rise above the commonwealth constitution as well as international treaties we are signatories to, yet this is occurring.
Under the state of emergency, the emergency requirements are qualified and restricted by the significant fact that emergency requirements and directions cannot request an individual to be isolated, detained, tested, vaccinated, medically treated or bodily searched in the absence of a biosecurity control order issued to the individual.
5| P a g e
These measures are referred to as biosecurity measures and are captured under Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 of the Biosecurity Act 2015. [28]
(Emergency and public health powers, at the States and Territories, do not provide a carte blanche to breach an individual’s human rights by isolating them, or detaining them or testing them without the proper required notifications and risk assessments first).
There is an inter-governmental agreement [29] which places the Commonwealth in the lead as well as the Australian Health Sector Emergency Response Plan[30]. This ensures that the States and Territories act to compliment the Federal Legislative Framework.
Article 7 of the international convention of civil and political rights states “no-one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.”[31]
Article 27 of the Vienna convention on the law of treatise “A party may not invoke the provision of its internal law as justification of its failure to perform a treaty.” [32]
Article 7 of the Australian human rights commission Act 1986 states “no-one should be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subject without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.[33]
Section 109 of the commonwealth of Australia constitution states “when a law of a state is inconsistent with a law of the commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall to the extent of the inconsistency be invalid.”[34]
With federal and international legislation breaches, it will be taken that we are complicit and consensual in their undertaking on the people of Australia, potentially rendering us criminally liable under the Crimes Act 1914[35], as well as the Criminal Code Act 1995[36].
Many members of the force are fed up with the approach to enforce oppressive rules placed upon the population in the name of COVID-19 and the looming mandatory vaccinations. We feel a real calling to do our part to stop this oppression, so we are writing to you to raise the following issues:-
•Police Force employees have ‘choice’ as to whether or not to receive vaccines;
•The Police believe that all members of the community also have choice around receiving vaccines;
•Police do not participate in anyway in the forcing of vaccines upon the population;
•That the Police Association start preparing to defend Police employees who choose to not be vaccinated
•To raise the alarm that there is a global dictatorship occurring and the Police Force is being used as a tool to push these global and corporate agendas upon the population; and
•To warn the Police Force not to simply acquiesce to these requests, rules and laws and to act in the best interest of its population, not tyranny of government.
Recently letters have been written to our leaders from the legal fraternity, including high profile Judges and QC's[37], The Australian Institute for Progress penned by 30 public
6| P a g e
intellectuals including 15 professors of relevant disciplines, one of whom is an advisor on health and well-being economics to the UK government[38], Advocate Me’s open letter to all leaders seeking to review disproportionate response to SAR-CoV-2 [39], as well as hundreds of doctors from the medical fraternity[40]. Despite the government continually parroting that they are following the advice of 'the experts', all these requests have been ignored and the police used as the enforcers of these senseless rules.
We ask that you consider the information provided herein and the NSW Police Force statement of values: -
Each member of the Police Force is to Act in a manner which:
•Places integrity above all;
•Upholds the rule of law;
•Preserves the rights and freedoms of individuals;
•Seeks to improve the quality of life by community involvement in policing;
•Strives for citizen and police personal satisfaction;
•Capitalises on the wealth of human resources;
•Makes efficient and economical use of public resources; and
•Ensures that authority is exercised responsibly.
Many of us believe that we are removing our own rights and freedoms by enforcing these rules upon the community, including our family and friends. And the community are confounded by the intensified police enforcement around peaceful freedom protests and how inconsistent this was when compared with the Black Lives Matter protests. This contradiction is further destroying public confidence.
We are reaching out to all our fellow police officers across the country, to write a similar letter to their respective police commissioners, or sign our form at https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth to show your support for this stance,which we have called Cops for Covid Truth.
With trust in our police force now seriously eroded, we ask you to consider now challenging the necessity of the ongoing restrictions to restore community trust, by being an integral part of returning our State and Country back to normality.
Regards
Alexander Cooney
Senior Constable Coffs/Clarence Highway Patrol
NSW Police Force Grafton Police Station
5 Duke Street Grafton NSW 2460
And other signatories
All source reference links below:-
Code:https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth/the-project https://12224e9c-a5fa-4daf-962b-f9379e0c0efa.filesusr.com/ugd/e12357_2548d50a7bb541acaa2c0705f46f6759.pdf
The World Freedom Alliance 2020 Announcement Video
This is the first meeting held by the newly founded World Freedom Alliance (WFA). The alliance would like to announce it's newly elected representatives.
President of the WFA - Prof Dolores Cahill, a professor in Molecular Biology and Immunology.
Vice President of the WFA - Heiko Schöning, M.D, a founding member of ACU2020.org
Chairman of the WFA - Maneka Helleberg, Chairman of People's Court and Member of New Earth.
Legal Advisor for the WFA - Martin Byrne, Barrister at Law practising in the Superior Courts, Dublin.
Treasurer of WFA - Mads Palsvig, Chairman of Political Party JFK21, a former investment banker.
General Secretary for the WFA - Fiona Hine, Political Activist and Events Manager, Founder of CoviLeaks.
Oracle Films stands with the WFA as the official video production team for the alliance.
https://oraclefilms.com
World Freedom Alliance: Stockholm
This Feature-Length documentary surrounds the establishment of the World Freedom Alliance (WFA) in Stockholm, Sweden, in November 2020.
The World Freedom Alliance will provide a worldwide platform linking with various associations and organisations offering access to justice, true dialogue for health science and politics while holding worldwide officials to account under the law. We will offer transparent evidence-based solutions and encourage robust debate with media, scientists and governments to ensure our fundamental freedoms of the people of the world are restored and maintained.
Our mission is to PROTECT our cherished freedoms, PROMOTE collaborations and links between groups of doctors, scientists, lawyers, professionals and freedom campaigners worldwide. We will PROVIDE transparent analysis of the data for business and innovative solutions to build a wonderful world for us, our children and future generations.
Part 1:
Part 2:
Better Normal, not New Normal – World Doctors Alliance
https://www.bitchute.com/embed/6ZN9XvVdDNpk
Code:https://acu2020.org/category/englisch/
Hmmm
The Ontario government is planning to issue some kind of proof-of-vaccination card to those who receive their COVID-19 shots. Health Minister Christine Elliott said that vaccination will be voluntary, but that people who refuse to be vaccinated could be barred from some activities.
this review report mentioned in the article shows how the PCR test, which is currently being used to determine the number of Corona cases all over the world, is deeply flawed and literally useless for such diagnostic purposes
RT-PCR Test to Detect SARS-CoV-2 Reveals 10 Major Scientific Flaws at the Molecular and Methodological Level: Consequences for False Positive Results
Abstract
AuthorsIn the publication entitled “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” (Eurosurveillance 25(8) 2020) [aka Corman-Drosten paper] the authors present a diagnostic workflow and RT-qPCR protocol for detection and diagnostics of 2019-nCoV (now known as SARS-CoV-2), which they claim to be validated, as well as being a robust diagnostic methodology for use in public-health laboratory settings.
In light of all the consequences resulting from this very publication for societies worldwide, a group of independent researchers performed a point-by-point review of the aforesaid publication in which 1) all components of the presented test design were cross checked, 2) the RT-qPCR protocol-recommendations were assessed w.r.t. good laboratory practice, and 3) parameters examined against relevant scientific literature covering the field.
The published RT-qPCR protocol for detection and diagnostics of 2019-nCoV and the manuscript suffer from numerous technical and scientific errors, including insufficient primer design, a problematic and insufficient RT-qPCR protocol, and the absence of an accurate test validation. Neither the presented test nor the manuscript itself fulfils the requirements for an acceptable scientific publication. Further, serious conflicts of interest of the authors are not mentioned. Finally, the very short timescale between submission and acceptance of the publication (24 hours) signifies that a systematic peer review process was either not performed here, or of problematic poor quality. We provide compelling evidence of several scientific inadequacies, errors and flaws.
Considering the scientific and methodological blemishes presented here, we are confident that the editorial board of Eurosurveillance has no other choice but to retract the publication.
Summary Catalogue of Errors Found in the PaperPieter Borger(1), Bobby Rajesh Malhotra(2) , Michael Yeadon(3) , Clare Craig(4), Kevin McKernan(5) , Klaus Steger(6) , Paul McSheehy(7) , Lidiya Angelova(8), Fabio Franchi(9), Thomas Binder(10), Henrik Ullrich(11) , Makoto Ohashi(12), Stefano Scoglio(13), Marjolein Doesburg-van Kleffens(14), Dorothea Gilbert(15), Rainer Klement(16), Ruth Schruefer(17), Berber W. Pieksma(18), Jan Bonte(19), Bruno H. Dalle Carbonare(20), Kevin P. Corbett(21), Ulrike Kämmerer(22)
The Corman-Drosten paper contains the following specific errors:
1. There exists no specified reason to use these extremely high concentrations of primers in this protocol. The described concentrations lead to increased nonspecific bindings and PCR product amplifications, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
2. Six unspecified wobbly positions will introduce an enormous variability in the real world laboratory implementations of this test; the confusing nonspecific description in the Corman-Drosten paper is not suitable as a Standard Operational Protocol making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
3. The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments. Therefore, the test cannot be used as a diagnostic for intact (infectious) viruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus and make inferences about the presence of an infection.
4. A difference of 10° C with respect to the annealing temperature Tm for primer pair1 (RdRp_SARSr_F and RdRp_SARSr_R) also makes the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
5. A severe error is the omission of a Ct value at which a sample is considered positive and negative. This Ct value is also not found in follow-up submissions making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
6. The PCR products have not been validated at the molecular level. This fact makes the protocol useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
7. The PCR test contains neither a unique positive control to evaluate its specificity for SARS-CoV-2 nor a negative control to exclude the presence of other coronaviruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
8. The test design in the Corman-Drosten paper is so vague and flawed that one can go in dozens of different directions; nothing is standardized and there is no SOP. This highly questions the scientific validity of the test and makes it unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
9. Most likely, the Corman-Drosten paper was not peer-reviewed making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
10. We find severe conflicts of interest for at least four authors, in addition to the fact that two of the authors of the Corman-Drosten paper (Christian Drosten and Chantal Reusken) are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance. A conflict of interest was added on July 29 2020 (Olfert Landt is CEO of TIB-Molbiol; Marco Kaiser is senior researcher at GenExpress and serves as scientific advisor for TIB-Molbiol), that was not declared in the original version (and still is missing in the PubMed version); TIB-Molbiol is the company which was “the first” to produce PCR kits (Light Mix) based on the protocol published in the Corman-Drosten manuscript, and according to their own words, they distributed these PCR-test kits before the publication was even submitted [20]; further, Victor Corman & Christian Drosten failed to mention their second affiliation: the commercial test laboratory “Labor Berlin”. Both are responsible for the virus diagnostics there [21] and the company operates in the realm of real time PCR-testing.
In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless.
the complete review report paper:
article:Code:https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/?fbclid=IwAR0sSncAmhHhhwzQ21ODbrVgEtYZ0zfZDkG9ZGqRFGQocXDNM8KW7YBd41A
Code:https://www.globalresearch.ca/external-peer-review-rt-pcr-test-detect-sars-cov-2-reveals-10-major-scientific-flaws-molecular-methodological-level-consequences-false-positive-results/5730889
the corrupt eugenic elite have a thing for depopulation and mass vaccination becomes the tool to accomplish this (causing death, lifelong disabilities & infertility)
Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon File Application for Suspension of All SARS CoV-2 Vaccine Studies and Call for Co-signing the Petition
On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).
Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.
On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.• The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
• The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
• The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
• The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.
Code:https://www.globalresearch.ca/dr-wodarg-dr-yeadon-request-stop-all-corona-vaccination-studies-call-co-signing-petition/5731458
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks