mRatio 5.4.1

[alpacino]

For trackers that don't allow scrape, keep an eye on the S/L of the torrents on the site.

[Marvelboy]

Can someone create uTorrent 3.5.5.44954 client file ??

[JohnareyouOK]

already read these faq posts:
A little tutorial on how to cheat on waffles
Waffles method v2
[tutorial] how to use waffles method on mR
, but still have one question:

yes, waffles method v2, stop-and-start repeatedly, which mRatio seems using, indeed makes other people cannot see our real Up/Down speeds in the peerlist by replacing it with 0KB/s, but check the screenshot, when <87.28% completed> and <21.08GB downloaded> are shown, and our up/down speed are ALWAYS 0KB/s, isn't it more suspicious?

i mean, yeah, ordinary users do also display 0KB/s but this usually occurs between the START announce and the first UPDATE announce. when we have already downloaded 21.08GB but still shows 0KB/s(and more importantly ALWAYS), won't this arouse the curiosity of the admin to observe our data further, so very risky?

if there is no misunderstanding what has been said above, then where is the correct place/context/scenario to use it?



---------- Post Merged at 14:17 ---------- Previous Post was at 02:43 ----------

For trackers that don't allow scrape, keep an eye on the S/L of the torrents on the site.

thank you for remind. apart from those trackers which don't return leechers num. even they do return, mRatio seems has bugs here, wireshark clearly shows after being announced with START event, the tracker responds with seeders=25 leecher=1 message, and RMP can parse it well at the same situation, but mRatio seems ignore this leecher field, which makes <change speeds if num of peers is less than X> cannot work accordingly.

The248 already inactive here, so pardon me posting this just for record...

[anon]

Sorry, you didn’t have such a client file matching the criteria?
I haven't updated client files for mratio since version uTorrent 3.5 and there was a need.

Uh, you can turn the feature off in uTorrent's advanced settings, so I don't see the need to downgrade. By the way, peer_id randomization never applied for private torrents. The reason we advice people to disable it nonetheless is that the memory reader feature may pick up wrong values if you have public torrents running.

I quickly read the last few pages and see that the author abandoned the development, which is undoubtedly sad (
Could you suggest which program is closest in functionality to Mratio from those present on the site (and it does not need Java runtime).
thank you very much!

http://www.sb-innovation.de/showthread.php?t=33029

Can someone create uTorrent 3.5.5.44954 client file ??

http://www.sb-innovation.de/showthread.php?t=34036

[anon]

i feel mRatio seems inferior to RatioMaster Plus on the comparison of the little feature <getting leechers num>(influenced by which the feature <change speed when leecher less than X> is). (hoping no offense by saying this, ofc mR is better than RMP in some other aspects, they're both awesome tool)

just want to consult with experts: is it a bias and caused by my mis-use? or is it true? i record a video to show: (same torrent, same tracker, same testing time)

*video*

thank you for remind. apart from those trackers which don't return leechers num. even they do return, mRatio seems has bugs here, wireshark clearly shows after being announced with START event, the tracker responds with seeders=25 leecher=1 message, and RMP can parse it well at the same situation, but mRatio seems ignore this leecher field, which makes <change speeds if num of peers is less than X> cannot work accordingly.

The248 already inactive here, so pardon me posting this just for record...

Looks like this is another bug in mRatio that is very unlikely to be ever fixed

That video has more censorship than a Japanese porn movie, by the way

yes, waffles method v2, stop-and-start repeatedly, which mRatio seems using, indeed makes other people cannot see our real Up/Down speeds in the peerlist by replacing it with 0KB/s, but check the screenshot, when <87.28% completed> and <21.08GB downloaded> are shown, and our up/down speed are ALWAYS 0KB/s, isn't it more suspicious?

i mean, yeah, ordinary users do also display 0KB/s but this usually occurs between the START announce and the first UPDATE announce. when we have already downloaded 21.08GB but still shows 0KB/s(and more importantly ALWAYS), won't this arouse the curiosity of the admin to observe our data further, so very risky?

Well, for you to be seen "always" at 0 KB/s, there must be someone watching the peerlist at all times... the idea behind this method is not being seen using the unrealistic speeds the Waffles method demands - 0 KB/s is better than 1 MB/s. Also, in the past (the first two threads are a decade old!), anti-cheating scripts made fewer checks when you stopped a torrent as opposed to keeping it running, so you could get away with a lot more fake upload that way.

[Marvelboy]

I ask again.. Can someone create one client file for uTorrent.v3.5.5.44994 to ??

Meny Thanks sb-innovation.. My Best site ever..

[anon]

I ask again.. Can someone create one client file for uTorrent.v3.5.5.44994 to ??

Okies, since that's been the latest build for a while I'll make clients for all programs, but you'll have to wait until tomorrow.

[Marvelboy]

No Problem.. I wait My Hero..

[anon]

Thanks, but it doesn't take a hero to do this

Anyway, http://www.sb-innovation.de/showthread.php?t=34039

[ntinos82st]

i have a problem last days.
when i try to memory read utorrent 221 25302 says me unable to read memory utorrent. unable to get process access. Before it was ok but n ow i dont understand what changing it

[anon]

i have a problem last days.
when i try to memory read utorrent 221 25302 says me unable to read memory utorrent. unable to get process access. Before it was ok but n ow i dont understand what changing it

Any chances you're running uTorrent (but not mRatio) as administrator or renamed its executable?

[Marvelboy]

Can someone create this client to 3.5.5 Build 45081 ?

Your Marvelboy somewhere in this world :-) :-):-)

[kxoty]

Hi there. Let me see if is possible leech in this scenario:

Machine 1
Linux Manjaro
Deluge 1.3.15

Machine 2
Windows 10
mRatio 5.4.1 with client Deluge 1.3.15

It's ok to leech and not get caught? I'm not going to use the two machines at the same time and the port is the same.

Thanks.

[anon]

Can someone create this client to 3.5.5 Build 45081 ?

Your Marvelboy somewhere in this world :-) :-):-)

Coming soon

Hi there. Let me see if is possible leech in this scenario:

Let's have a look at how Deluge handles peer_id and key generation (from http://www.sb-innovation.de/showthread.php?t=33447):

    "keyGenerator": {
        "length": 8,
        "type": "hash_no_leading_zero",
        "refreshOn": "TORRENT_PERSISTENT",
        "case": "upper"
    },
    "peerIdGenerator": {
        "pattern": "xxxxxxxxxxxxx",
        "refreshOn": "NEVER",
        "shouldUrlEncode": false
    },

This means it uses a global peer_id that never changes during runtime, and a key that is individual to each torrent, but never changes during runtime either. If you were able to replicate the former, it would be possible to run the real Deluge and its mRatio emulation at the same time, but mRatio doesn't support memory reading for anything other than uTorrent.

Hence, you should not run any torrents from the same tracker on both programs at the same time. Stop and close the instance of Deluge that's running on Linux, then start mRatio.

Also, Deluge says nothing about the system it's running under in its requests, so that has no relevance and is not a problem.

[kxoty]

Thank you for the explanation anon, now it's time to seed.