The best audio-player ???

[saebrtooth]

wtf?
and it only works on mac OSs
Amarra Computer Music Player

Amarra 2.0 Computer Music Player ::

    

Amarra 2.0 Software Features ::

    • Improved User Interface and sound quality.
    • Support for FLAC, AAC and MP3 playback.
    Note: FLAC playback requires installing FLAC components.
    Note: Fluke required for use with iTunes.
    • New Playlist window. Allows you to create and save custom Playlists within Amarra. Our testing as well as our beta testers report improved audio quality using Playlist mode when compared to iTunes mode.
    • Improved Background Manager:
    -- Advanced iZotope 64-bit Sample Rate Conversion and enhancements.
    -- Background FLAC conversion to AIFF.
    -- Enhanced Background Manager user interface.
    • Improved support for non-latin character sets and extended file names.
    • Support for NoNOISE™ broadband noise removal plug-in option.
    • Play CDs through Amarra using your Mac as a transport.
    • Works with all Core Audio Interfaces.
    • Improved high-resolution Sonic EQ: Save and recall your favorite settings.
    • Automatic hardware sample rate adjustment based on the native sample rate of the song being played.
    • Adjustable digital volume with automated dither processing
    • AutoPilot - Playlist autoloading of consecutive tracks from iTunes.
    • Enhanced integration with Sonic Hardware including:
    -- Dim Front Panel
    -- Control Volume and adjustment settings
    • Click here to learn more about Amarra...
    • New Reduced Price: $695.00 USD

[Lucius1]

foobar2000 ftw

[anon]

foobar2000 ftw

Care to tell us why?

[Vuze-Sbi]

Yeah for real ,please tell cause a lot of people have mentinoed about it .Wanna know what's good about it and how? can be better than my old winamp.

[Lucius1]

foobar2000 can play flac. winamp can't ( without a plugin or smth like that)

better design and functionality . for example you can see all the music in your pc in a list sorted by genre, folder structure etc.

simple UI and low memory use.

you can convert between different encodes easily. etc.
( you have to install it and use for a couple of days to see all of the details that make foobar the best audio player)

[biren]

Prefer media player classic because it is very easy to use and dont need many ram.Prefered for old computers that cant play easy 720p or 1080p files.And as for audio player is excellent it support everything.

[anon]

Prefer media player classic because it is very easy to use and dont need many ram.Prefered for old computers that cant play easy 720p or 1080p files.

The codec you're using to decode such material also plays a very important part, also.

In other words, use CoreAVC.

[Vuze-Sbi]

Is it possible to use core avc with km player ?

[anon]

Didn't try it with KM, but since CoreAVC is a codec, I doubt which player you use matters too much. Just disable the player's internal filters (if any) to let it take precedence.

[silencer1980]

if we are talking about video play

COREAVC + MPC-HT is the best with CUDA ACC. video card.
or USE DXVA with ATi 4000 series or above card.

[buta]

I like foobar for music and use Km player for video

[peepin]

I am using foobar, tiny ,powerful and good quality.

[Sb Lover]

I am using WMP + mini lyrics + K-Lite Codec Pack !!
I like WMP for it's library ! and it is really simple !
+ for videos I prefer Km Player !!