+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: StarCraft II LAN petition hits 100,000 signatures petition hits 100,000 signatures

  1. #1

    Join Date
    10.04.09
    Location
    Valhalla
    P2P Client
    some sexymode
    Posts
    234
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 18/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss234

    StarCraft II LAN petition hits 100,000 signatures petition hits 100,000 signatures

    StarCraft II LAN petition hits 100,000 signatures
    Sean Ridgeley - Monday, August 17th, 2009

    Fans plead with Blizzard

    Product Mini Profile

    StarCraft II
    in: Real-time Strategy (PC)
    links »
    p/reviews

    Following Activision Blizzard's announcement of dropping Local Area Network (LAN) support for StarCraft II due to piracy, fans (and even non-fans) clamoured at the thought. No more oldschool LAN parties, it seemed; the pseudo ones that are to be had are sure to be smaller in scale and also have major lag at times. More, a requisite traditional Internet connection is a real joykiller to the gaming community.

    It is for these reasons and a multitude of others they are asking those concerned to sign a petition for the purpose of getting the feature back in there where they feel it belongs. On the piracy front, the fans state removing LAN play will merely encourage gamers to use services and servers also used for piracy-related functions, as sometimes Battle.net can be laggy, for example. True, Blizzard have delayed StarCraft II in order to improve the service, but would they have had to in the first place if they'd kept LAN in?

    Here are their list of "reasons to keep it":

    - While many of your fans might have internet access with the required speed to play without lag, there are still many that don't, or would like to play with a friend or sibling residing in the same house. LAN is NOT an expensive upgrade, and once you have it, it’s yours. Internet is something that you have to pay for every month, and in a bad month you might choose to buy groceries instead of paying for the internet.

    - LAN is what birthed SC popularity in the first place. Please don't ignore the heritage of the original game.

    - Using LAN is a little bit of freedom. Often you might be at a friend's place with the only option to ad hoc the wireless connections instead of using internet, excluding the Battle.net gaming possibility.

    - There are little to no ill effects in implementing LAN compared to the advantages. The piracy rate of people actually interested in the game would be negligible. Just look at SC1 now. Even with a laggy Battle.net, it is still selling so well that it once again reached top-10 on the NPD charts a decade after its release!

    -Having LAN functionality in the game makes it feel you have more freedom of choice. You can choose to be part of the greater community, or you can choose to just play with one or two friends. LAN is a vital part of what makes StarCraft so great, and what will make StarCraft II even greater. Sometimes you don't have to use a function in order to appreciate having it there. It's the sort of freedom we have come to expect from Blizzard Entertainment.

    At present, it boasts over 100,000 signatures, representing a potential $5 million in lost sales. The questions are, how many will it take for Activision Blizzard to care, and would these people buy the game anyway?
    SIGN NOW AND SPREAD THE WORD: LAN in Starcraft 2 Please. Petition

    I did my part
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  2. Who Said Thanks:

    (18.01.22)

  3. #2
    Advanced User
    yoco's Avatar
    Join Date
    23.02.08
    Location
    Slovenia
    P2P Client
    Azureus
    Posts
    7,977
    Activity Longevity
    6/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss7977
    Signed!
    Is there any number how many signatures there must be?
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  4. #3

    Join Date
    10.04.09
    Location
    Valhalla
    P2P Client
    some sexymode
    Posts
    234
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 18/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss234
    Quote Originally Posted by yoco View Post
    Signed!
    Is there any number how many signatures there must be?
    the more is the beter
    end nop there is no how many.
    regards
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  5. #4
    Advanced User alpacino's Avatar
    Join Date
    18.03.09
    Location
    locked in Alchemilla Hospital
    P2P Client
    none, just the toolz
    Posts
    2,066
    Activity Longevity
    7/20 18/20
    Today Posts
    1/5 sssss2066
    This is very good news, I think they will include it in the last moments. It would be awkward not to.
    it's hip to be square
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  6. #5

    Join Date
    18.12.07
    Location
    .:under your bed:.
    Posts
    296
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 20/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss296
    i don't think they'll change their minds. i reckon the closest they'll get will be to impliment some kind of online authentication before you can use the copy offline... either that or it'll be tied to battlenet whilst playing on lan so that your online profile will update accordingly wether you like it or not...

    chances are some smart crackers will find a way around it though...
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  7. #6

    Join Date
    07.08.08
    Posts
    205
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss205
    Signed. But it isn't going to change.

    Hamachi has killed unrestricted LAN.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  8. #7


    Join Date
    22.06.08
    Location
    astral planes
    P2P Client
    sbi finest
    Posts
    3,125
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss3125
    nice numbers, two months ago it was about 30 000 signatures

    if this won't make them change their minds it would be really shameful to ignore such a number of potential buyers & game fans, its not like they are asking to reinvent hot water or something...

    i would strongly be in favor of not buying the game if blizzard continues their ignorant politics - user opinion (on whose money,interest & support blizzard depends) must be respected - remember that one: the buyer/customer is always right? - well, looks like some companies need to rethink their strategies and get off that high horse
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  9. #8
    Advanced User alpacino's Avatar
    Join Date
    18.03.09
    Location
    locked in Alchemilla Hospital
    P2P Client
    none, just the toolz
    Posts
    2,066
    Activity Longevity
    7/20 18/20
    Today Posts
    1/5 sssss2066
    I decided not to buy if LAN play won't be included. Unfortunately not that many people know about this I think. I'm sure many folks will surprised when the retail comes out.
    it's hip to be square
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  10. #9

    Join Date
    15.06.09
    Location
    Canada
    P2P Client
    UTorrent
    Posts
    1
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 18/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssssss1
    they are just doing this to prevent stop Garena's popularity, but they forget that battle.net can be also emulated aka eurobattle.net fail policy really.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  11. #10

    Join Date
    13.06.09
    P2P Client
    Extreme Mod
    Posts
    71
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 18/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssssss71
    What is so hard with implementing a LAN option if theres going to be an online option LAN shouldnt be that hard its not like they are going to spend a lot more on it than they already have. I mean they may not want people going from LAN to Battle.net they could make you make 2 different characters that are dedicated to that arena.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •