I also prefer R5 quality or above on the gounds that CAM's looks horrible IMHO
When is great or promising movie I prefer go to cinema like this one
I also prefer R5 quality or above on the gounds that CAM's looks horrible IMHO
When is great or promising movie I prefer go to cinema like this one
No movie should be watched as cam. Groups that release cam and telesync should be shot.
I don't use screeners or r5 either, proper dvd/br source only.
It's really shame to ruin your experience watching a good movie with poor picture or sound.
Btw, I haven't seen Avatar yet
nothing is worth watching on CAM! IMO.
the only thing I ever saw that wasn't in DVD quality was Cars in telesync and it looked fucking good!
probably because it was an animation.
@ Shutter Island. looks really promising. suppose to be something a lot of critics rely on.
my friend saw it a few days ago said it was good.
I don't believe in the whole concept of "the director is known to have "quality" movies so the movie must be good".
I'll have to put it in my test!
Haha I have to disagree, screeners in particular usually come outs weeks before dvdrips and the only difference is the watermark, which some groups try to blur out.I don't use screeners or r5 either, proper dvd/br source only.
That said, yes CAM's and TS's of good movies should be avoided at ALL costs
They're only doing their job.Plus some CAMs have really nice quality,for a CAM...No movie should be watched as cam. Groups that release cam and telesync should be shot.I saw it Xvid.Isn't that enough?Btw, I haven't seen Avatar yet
Although I generally prefer high qual, there was one time i did watch cam the qual was crap but i loved the movie "Enterprise" cos ima big fan . But if it were anything else I woulndt go near it
dont ban me just spank me
I *Think* a Dvd Screener of Avatar came out a while ago.
@grebetu.
I think this is pretty watchable.
It's from the Flawless release.
Last edited by SBfreak; 09.03.10 at 13:06.
dont ban me just spank me
Bookmarks