The nicest thing is that if they ever found out you have been visiting SB-I via the CSS Leak, they won't even remotely care about all your hard legitimate seeding work with your crappy upload speed when the time of pressing the ban button comes.
Printable View
yes, i believe that, even tho i haven't heard of CSS leak (i'll google it right now to avoid bothering you with explanation) :)
still, that wouldn't change my love for all the work that came into what.cd code :wink2:
i remember oink was at least as strict as that, and i can say what.cd is much better FOR ME. not to mention horrid bitmetv ban-happy ops that made me absolutely loathe bitmetv even tho i have never been banned for cheating :)
Have a look at this:
SB-Innovation - Leecher Mod Source Nr. 1 - Announcements in Forum : Talk
Thanks anon, scary thingie, brilliantly thought out usage of css, I doubt it can ever get a status of exploit on bugzilla as it is perfectly legit usage of both js and css.
Guess clearing history and then surfing SB-I only by using firefox "private browsing" mode would defeat that, but one needs to maintain discipline :)
That would do. You could also disable History entirely (works on Firefox ONLY), prevent SB-I pages from entering it with the HistoryBlock FF addon or, the easiest solution (for me), use one browser for our board and another one for trackers.Quote:
Guess clearing history and then surfing SB-I only by using firefox "private browsing" mode would defeat that, but one needs to maintain discipline :)
historyblock sounds awesome :top:, i should test that as it sounds best for my taste.
otherwise different browser is simple, and elegant solution :klatsch_3: different firefox profiles would probably work too, but one wouldn't have advantage of visual distinction. thanks, end of offtopic rant from me :)
I like what.cd too, and a lot i might say but the staff there is horrible and that makes me loose all my respect for it as a tracker.
It's not off-topic. Visiting SB-I is a part of "cheating on What.cd"! :wink:
Different Firefox profiles work as well. About no visual distinction, I thought of the Titlebar Tweaks addon, but unfortunately that doesn't work on 3.0+. I guess you could place the buttons on a different position or something like that.
And if I remember correctly, there's a command-line parameter to choose which one you want to use upon start-up, to make even less hassle :tongue:
Compared to the staff at torrentleech and some others, what.cd staff are probably the most lenient lol. I honestly never saw what was so mean and horrible about them. :confused:
What.cd is probably the only tracker where I try to seed legitimately not out of fear of cheating but because I really like the place, eventhough I used GT only to go up user classes.
What.cd bans users and invite trees just to be cautious and to make the users afraid of inviting bad people. I've seen threads where Elite users never used their invites because of it lol
But the same could be said about a tracker like bcg, where the inviter gets screwed over if the invitee cheats/neglects their account.
If they have to make users do that through fear... not the right move in my opinion. Also, even if my inviter is a cheater/trader/etc., that doesn't mean I am one. But in the end it's their tracker and they're free to run it however they want.
I don't mind it tbh, since it'd be my fault if I invited a cheater and he got both me and him banned. But in a way, its the reason why theres so many users with seedboxes, so they don't have to cheat and that makes the tracker fast and theres always at least 1 seeder on a torrent, as long as it isn't years old. While they do ban invite trees, at least they aren't like torrentleech where if you decide to get a seedbox and forgot to tell the staff beforehand,you'll get banned from suspicion of cheating.