Quote:
you obviously didn't watch the conference, otherwise you would know what they were discussing there, btw it was international with representatives from the west & israel too
Why didn't you mention that the organizer of this conference was ahmdi negad who said that he wants to exterminate all jews ?
you should be ashamed of yourself!
Quote:
i just gave you a set of counter-arguments for the first link, it was easy to 'debunk' it in ~5 minutes, simply because these sites aren't really discovering anything new, just denying (any) involvement of their government through shifting focus on less important elements or misinterpreting things - a serious site would have in-depth analysis with multiple images (or details), thoroughly dissected from many angles and viewpoints
I have nothing to say about this , you should review what you have said in previous posts , I'm not gonna copy and paste your posts.
Quote:
so i'll just point at a few things: the amount of jet fuel is limited and it burns fast and most of it exploded outside as seen on photos, so there wouldn't be enough time or temperature to melt that steel - even if it really happened (melting), the building would collapse sideways or eventually slide aside and no way it would fall very similar to controlled demolition - even if this was wrong, there is no way one could find molten steel in the rubble having temperatures way higher than jet fuel can ever achieve - so you see, these theories fail on multiple levels (and i mentioned just the obvious ones!)
I wonder if you read what i just said in my last post !
Why do you keep reposting the same false arguments :confused::
Quote:
Mechanics of Twin Towers' collapse
Both buildings collapsed symmetrically and more or less straight down, though there was some tilting of the tops of the towers and a significant amount of fallout to the sides. In both cases, the portion of the building that had been damaged by the airplanes failed, which allowed the section above the airplane impacts to fall onto the undamaged structure below. As the collapse progressed, dust and debris could be seen shooting out of the windows several floors below the advancing destruction. The first fragments of the outer walls of the collapsed North Tower struck the ground 9 seconds after the collapse started, and parts of the South Tower after 11 seconds. The lower portions of both buildings' cores (60 stories of WTC 1 and 40 stories of WTC 2) remained standing for up to 25 seconds after the start of the initial collapse before they too collapsed.[12]
While they were designed to support enormous static loads, they provided little resistance to the moving mass of the sections above the floors where the collapses initiated. Structural systems respond very differently to static and dynamic loads, and since the motion of the falling portion began as a free fall through the height of at least one story (roughly three meters), the structure beneath them was unable to stop the collapses once they began. Indeed, a fall of only half a meter would have been enough to release the necessary energy to begin an unstoppable collapse.[26]
Quote:
Collapse initiation
After the planes hit the buildings, but before they collapsed, the cores of both towers consisted of three distinct sections. Above and below the impact floors, the cores consisted of what were essentially two rigid boxes; the steel in these sections was undamaged and had undergone no significant heating. The section between them, however, had sustained significant damage and, though they were not hot enough to melt it, the fires were weakening the structural steel. As a result, the core columns were slowly being crushed, sustaining plastic and creep deformation from the weight of higher floors. As the top section tried to move downward, however, the hat truss redistributed the load to the perimeter columns. Meanwhile, the perimeter columns and floors were also being weakened by the heat of the fires, and as the floors began to sag they pulled the exterior walls inwards. In the case of 2 WTC, this caused the eastern face to buckle, transferring its loads back to the failing core through the hat truss and initiating the collapse. The section above the impact area then tilted in the direction of the failed wall. In the case of 1 WTC, the south wall later buckled in the same way, and with similar consequences.[27]
[edit] Total progressive collapse
The collapse of the World Trade Center has been called "the most infamous paradigm" of progressive collapse.[28] In the case of both towers, the top section tilted towards the face that had buckled, behaving largely as a solid block separate from the rest of the building. It fell at least one story in freefall and impacted the lower sections with a force equivalent to over thirty times its own weight. This was sufficient to buckle the columns of the story immediately below it; the block then fell freely through the distance of another story. Total collapse was now unavoidable as the process repeated through the entire height of the lower sections. The force of each impact was also much greater than the horizontal momentum of the section, which kept the tilt from increasing significantly before the falling section reached the ground. It remained intact throughout the collapse, with its center of gravity within the building's footprint. After crushing the lower section of the building, it was itself crushed when it hit the ground.[28]
Quote:
On September 13, 2001, Zdeněk Bažant, professor of civil engineering and materials science at Northwestern University, circulated a draft paper with results of a simple analysis of the World Trade Center collapse. Bažant suggested that heat from the fires was a key factor, causing steel columns in both the core and the perimeter to weaken and experience deformation before losing their carrying capacity and buckling. Once more than half of the columns on a particular floor buckled, the overhead structure could no longer be supported and complete collapse of the structures occurred. Bažant later published an expanded version of this analysis.[31] Other analyses were conducted by MIT civil engineers Oral Buyukozturk and Franz-Josef Ulm, who also described a collapse mechanism on September 21, 2001.[32] They later contributed to an MIT collection of papers on the WTC collapses edited by Eduardo Kausel called The Towers Lost and Beyond.[33]
Collapse of the World Trade Center - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
but, i have wasted enough time on this issue, as you are probably too young to understand these points, which can be seen from your arguments, reasoning, behavior and a large dosage of naivety and impulsiveness...give it a decade or so, hopefully then your rationale will sufficiently mature for a more quality perspective...
I'm not gonna respond in the same way but you should seriously read some quality stuff rather than reading to a teenager conspiracy buff :biggrin:
Regards!