the camera(s) need only to watch the sealed boxes where votes are put into, so that no one tampers with them during the dayQuote:
Originally Posted by anon
it was meant as 'they are barely able to get a candidate or few of their own elected', thus more willing to cooperate with larger party reps who may be routinely fixing the votes and turn a blind eye on such fraudulent activity - naturally in return, they would be awarded extra votes, which translates to more own candidates elected or financially through briberyQuote:
Not sure about your comment regarding small party reps. If they're desperate for more votes, they would be corrupt in their own favor, but if they're up for sale, wouldn't the "buyer" want to get votes for his party instead?
so if someone is preparing to fix the scores and wants to handle the volunteer problem, all it takes is to apply two of their own(ed) 'volunteers' earlier than othersQuote:
I suppose they just send the rest home.
i was thinking professional or internal polls, not meant for the public - these need to be accurate or they would be out of businessQuote:
Polls can give a good outline but also say whatever who's behind them wants them to say