+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: BlockList Manager and Peerguardian

  1. #16
    Advanced User saebrtooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    21.06.09
    Location
    somewhere?
    P2P Client
    An eMule & VEM
    Posts
    2,150
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 18/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss2150

    PeerBlock 1.0+ (r404)

    latest beta PeerBlock 1.0+ (r404)

    Release Notes

    Code:
    This is our latest Beta Release, released June 9, 2010. 
    
    Beta Releases contain newer fixes and features than our Stable Releases, and by definition not necessarily as stable.  While we have tested them out internally, until they've been included in Beta Releases for awhile we won't really consider them to have received enough "airtime" to be considered ready for inclusion in a new Stable Release.  They are also released much more frequently than Stable Releases, generally once every few weeks (instead of once every few months) - if the frequency of update notices annoys you, install a Stable Release instead!
    
     
    What's New
    
    Here are the major changes since the most recent Beta Release, r320:
    
        * Better "Last Updated" handling for list-update checking - Many users have been experiencing problems with updated lists not being detected, after iblocklist.com's change to start reporting actual last-modified timestamps.   We should now be correctly catching updated lists.
        * Updated History Setting Defaults - Changed the defaults for History settings to "Remove every 7 days" and Max Size = 100 MB.  If your settings have these left at the old defaults, PeerBlock will pop up a window during your first run that advises you that it's making these changes.  This should help prevent problems with history.db becoming corrupted and/or growing to an absurd size.
        * Changed Systray-icon Left-click Handling - New behavior:  If the window is minimized, restore it.  If the window is at all hidden by other windows, bring it to top.  If window is already at top, minimize it.
        * Changed "Allow HTTP for X min" Visible Handling - If you select the "Allow HTTP for X min" option in the right-click menu, that option will now be highlighted.  Previously, it would highlight the "Allow HTTP" button.   Also note that transitioning from one Allow HTTP state to another will not start Blocking HTTP, only clicking a currently-selected Allow HTTP option will restart HTTP Blocking.
        * New Manually-settable Options - Added two options to the peerblock.conf config-file, for people who don't like some of the new features we've added during our Beta period.  "ListSanityChecking" lets you disable the List-add Sanity-checking (for dupes, non-iblocklist URLs, etc.) by setting it to "no"; "WarningIconForHttpAllow" lets you make it so that we will not change to a yellow "warning" icon if you're Allowing HTTP, if you set it to "no".
        * New Splashscreen and Installer Pic - These have been updated with some new images sent in by the new Graphics Guy on our team, Mourad.
    
    Additional minor changes can be found on the r404 Changes page.
    dont ban me just spank me
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  2. Who Said Thanks:

    Vation (13.06.10) , SBfreak (10.06.10) , tokiodrift1 (10.06.10)

  3. #17
    Advanced User Renk's Avatar
    Join Date
    17.08.08
    Location
    Elsewhere
    P2P Client
    utorrent
    Posts
    581
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss581
    A problem -if I remember correctly- with PG was it had no action on an already established connection with ip filtered IPs: One day, I forgot to run PG and started emule first (and PG after a while). I then saw there were data flows between me and some IP considered as bad by the filters PG was using.

    I don't know if the same problem may occur with PeerBlock.


    I currently use P2PFire, and I'm very satisfied by this tool: It's very light, and with its ability to manage 4 IPs lists (block.p2p guarding.p2p, ipfilter.dat and white.p2p) that it optimizes before usage (eliminating redundancy), it shares some basics feature with BLM. BLM can do much more for sure, but I find this app too bloated for a basic usage. Moreover -again if I remember correctly- P2PFire forbid connections, while PG (and PB I tthink) only blocks data flows. On this aspect, P2PFire looks like a bit more secure to me. The only thing I regret with P2PFire is its unability to update IPs lists via http links usage: You ave to manuallly download the lists, unrar/zip them, and copy/paste to guarding;P2p, block.p2p, ipfilter.dat or white.p2P, which is boring when you upload your lists on a regular basis (e.g every weeks).


    A feature I would like to find in such apps is the ability to block only uploads to some "semi filtered" Ips. Do you know a mean/a soft able to do that ?
    Last edited by Renk; 10.06.10 at 22:28.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  4. #18
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,410
    Activity Longevity
    6/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssss39410
    Quote Originally Posted by Renk View Post
    A feature I would like to find in such apps is the ability to block only uploads to some "semi filtered" Ips. Do you know a mean/a soft able to do that ?
    You need a certain degree of upload to be able to download from them (TCP overhead).
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  5. #19
    Advanced User saebrtooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    21.06.09
    Location
    somewhere?
    P2P Client
    An eMule & VEM
    Posts
    2,150
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 18/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss2150
    Peerblock blocks all protocols to and from blocked IPs ie it blocks as u would put it all connections and "data flows". And PeerBlock can handle man many block lists, downloaded from its own site or customised 3rd party

    and wot do u mean by "semi-filtered" as in u want to block RIAA but not MPAA, I dont think u mean that but semi sounds strange

    U can manually add exceptions in PeerBlock, right click
    choose allow 15min, 1 hr, permanent
    dont ban me just spank me
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  6. #20
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,410
    Activity Longevity
    6/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssss39410
    Quote Originally Posted by saebrtooth View Post
    and wot do u mean by "semi-filtered" as in u want to block RIAA but not MPAA, I dont think u mean that but semi sounds strange
    What he wants to achieve is being able to download from "semi-filtered" hosts, but not upload to them in P2P. However, that isn't really possible - the PeerBlock team couldn't "hard" disable upload, as you need to upload TCP overhead (ACK packets, etc.) to be able to download from anyone.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  7. #21
    Advanced User saebrtooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    21.06.09
    Location
    somewhere?
    P2P Client
    An eMule & VEM
    Posts
    2,150
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 18/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss2150
    i agree its not possible, u have to make contact in order to download even if u dont upload
    dont ban me just spank me
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  8. #22
    Advanced User Renk's Avatar
    Join Date
    17.08.08
    Location
    Elsewhere
    P2P Client
    utorrent
    Posts
    581
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss581
    Quote Originally Posted by saebrtooth View Post
    i agree its not possible, u have to make contact in order to download even if u dont upload
    Of course, "semi filtering" IP would not prevent any contact, since download from these "semi filtered" IPs would have to be allowed. A bit like what happens with bad leecher clients. When noup feature is activated, you download data from people who are unable to download data from you (except some trivial overhead).

    What is possible for all IPs would have to be possible for selected IPs belonging to a list, or I forget something ??
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  9. #23
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,410
    Activity Longevity
    6/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssss39410
    Quote Originally Posted by Renk View Post
    When noup feature is activated, you download data from people who are unable to download data from you (except some trivial overhead).
    That trivial overhead is the key

    The only way to achieve what you want would be if PeerBlock had some kind of protocol analyzing code that will take out "real" upload from connections... and you can imagine the CPU usage... so it's pretty much impossible.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  10. Who Said Thanks:

    Renk (12.06.10)

  11. #24
    Advanced User Renk's Avatar
    Join Date
    17.08.08
    Location
    Elsewhere
    P2P Client
    utorrent
    Posts
    581
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssssss581
    Quote Originally Posted by anon View Post
    That trivial overhead is the key

    The only way to achieve what you want would be if PeerBlock had some kind of protocol analyzing code that will take out "real" upload from connections... and you can imagine the CPU usage... so it's pretty much impossible.

    I "semi understand" what you wrote, surely because I remain a n00b is this area (although a n00b laboriously trying to learn). When you send something to someone, you know perfectly (because you are the sender and you have chose what has to be sent), what is overhead and what is data content. When e.g. you send a letter by postmail, you are perfectly able to diffferentiate the recipient's address and your own adress that you send to him in order he will able to answer to you, from the content of the letter you send to him.

    I agree that a soft like peerblock is not able to analyse the traffic between you and the wild wide web, but when your computer send something, something somewhere in your computer "knows" what is data content, and what is overhead.

    The feature that I think would be as sending to some recipients belonging to some list, only "white letters", with only the recipient's address (for the postmant do his job), a request ("I'm searching for that thing") and your own address (for the recipient be able to send you the thing you are searching).


    Or perhaps what I have in mind would require a specific hardware device such as januspa or something like that ???




    Quote Originally Posted by saebrtooth
    and wot do u mean by "semi-filtered" as in u want to block RIAA but not MPAA, I dont think u mean that but semi sounds strange

    No no no, and anon correctly stated what I meant. Concerning RIAA & MPAA, I even would like to have a code to "voodoo doll" them, but anon, who is a killjoy, will surely explain to me that's impossible again.
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  12. #25
    Moderator anon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01.02.08
    Posts
    39,410
    Activity Longevity
    6/20 19/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 ssss39410
    Quote Originally Posted by Renk View Post
    I "semi understand" what you wrote, surely because I remain a n00b is this area (although a n00b laboriously trying to learn).
    No worries. I'm not exactly an IT pro, either.

    The feature that I think would be as sending to some recipients belonging to some list, only "white letters", with only the recipient's address (for the postmant do his job), a request ("I'm searching for that thing") and your own address (for the recipient be able to send you the thing you are searching).
    This makes sense, is possible and is actually how no upload operates in the eMule SBI mod, for example, but is beyond the capabilities of an IP blocker like PeerBlock.
    "I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

  13. #26
    Advanced User saebrtooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    21.06.09
    Location
    somewhere?
    P2P Client
    An eMule & VEM
    Posts
    2,150
    Activity Longevity
    0/20 18/20
    Today Posts
    0/5 sssss2150
    Renk from ur posts what u mean by semi-filtered maybe should be named one-way flter. What u describe unfortunately is something everyone would like to have emule/bt etc but security or practically not feasable. Even if u were able to real download from anti p2p orgs and routing to a proxy and then route it again to ur real the stuff u download would be very likely be fake.

    But good idea
    dont ban me just spank me
    Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
    Thanks

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •