und die zeigen:
when a method of estimating global temperature change was needed for comparison with one-dimensional global climate models.
and there was net global warming of about 0.4°C between the 1880s and 1970s.
A global temperature index, as described by Hansen et al. (1996), is obtained by combining the meteorological station measurements with sea surface temperatures based in early years on ship measurements and in recent decades on satellite measurements
The analysis is limited to the period since 1880 because of poor spatial coverage of stations and decreasing data quality prior to that time.
A 2003 survey of 530 climate scientists in 27 countries, conducted by Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch at the GKSS Institute of Coastal Research in Germany, foundSehr intressant zu dem Thema eine Klimakonferenz der Klimaskeptiker in NEW YORK 2008.
* 82 percent said global warming is happening, but only
* 56 percent said it’s mostly the result of human causes, and only
* 35 percent said models can accurately predict future climate conditions.
Only 27 percent believed “the current state of scientific knowledge is able to provide reasonable predictions of climate variability on time scales of 100 years.”
That’s a long ways from “consensus.” It’s actually pretty close to what the American public told pollsters for the Pew Trust in 2006:
* 70 percent thought global warming is happening,
* only 41 percent thought it was due to human causes,
* and only 19 percent thought it was a high-priority issue.
The alarmists think it’s a “paradox” that the more people learn about climate change, the less likely they are to consider it a serious problem. But as John Tierney with The New York Times points out in a blog posted just a day ago, maybe, just maybe, it’s because people are smart rather than stupid.
We invited Al Gore to speak to us tonight, and even agreed to pay his $200,000 honorarium. He refused. We invited some of the well-known scientists associated with the alarmist camp, and they refused.
der Konferenzpresident sagt anders:Diese Wissenschaftler erhielten von der Industrie für ihre Aussagen Geldmittel
um das Thema einseitig Industrie freundlich dar zu stellen.
* No corporate dollars were used to help finance this conference.
* The Heartland Institute has 2,700 donors, and gets about 16 percent of its income from corporations.
* Heartland gets less than 5 percent of its income from all energy-producing companies combined. We are 95 percent carbon free.
ACARE targets a 50 per cent reduction in CO2 emissions, 80 per cent reduction in NOx emissions, and 50 per cent reduction in noise by 2020, compared to aircraft in service in 2000.man wolle bis zum Jahre 2020 den Kohlendioxid Ausstoß pro Passagier halbieren.......wie soll das möglich sein?
wahrscheinlich mit bessere Filtern, effizienter Treibstoff Verbrennung, Additive usw.
ja, aber ohne das irgendetwas durch die Erde absorbiert wird, wir koennen nicht annehmen das die Erde nur erdlich produzierte Elemente absorbieren kann und das die Gleichgewicht so einfach gestoert wirdIch hatte es vorgerechnet, wieviel der Anteil beträgt und welche Steigerungen des Atemluftanteils möglich sind.
During the last Ice Age the maximum extent of glaciation was around 16,000 B.C. At that time large ice sheets covered all of Canada, much of the American midwest and northeast, all of Scandinavia and some surrounding regions of Eurasia. The total volume of ice then was perhaps 80,000,000 cubic kilometers, or between two and three times as much as today. Correspondingly, world sea level was about 120 meters lowerNicht ganz korrekt: Der Sonnenabstand ist zwar ein Grund, ändert sich aber nicht ausreichend.
ja, wenn das nicht ausreichend ist (direkte Konsequenz von Sonne-Erde position)...
und sollte so sein fuer durhschnittliche Temperaturen, CO2, Eismenge und Ozeanniveau:Wenn man den Anstieg allerdings mit dem, den es vorher in den Warmzeiten gab, betrachtet, so ist dieser heute höher.
Currently the Earth is exiting a period of glaciation. rising sea level has been the norm for the last 20,000 years, not the exception.
wenn wir nach einige Jahren aus der Erwaermungsperiod wieder ins Erkaeltungsperiod steigen bis zum der naechste Vereisung/Glaciation Gipfelpunkt dann werden alle obengenannte Variablen wieder runter gehen (auch mit oder ohne unsere 'Hilfe')
das koennte noch eine Manipulation sein:Auch das Problem, das die Rohstoffe, wie Kohle und Öl nur noch 50 Jahre reichen sollte zum Umdenken anregen
Is oil running out – or in?
If by volume a millionth of the interior of the earth contains oil, there is enough to last 260,000 years. But if 1/250,000 of the earth is oil, which is only about the volume of the Mediterranean Sea, and which does not seem at all unreasonable, at the present rate of consumption we can drive our SUVs around for another million years. That's right, one million years.
Code:http://www.predictweather.co.nz/assets/articles/article_resources.php?id=98
Bookmarks