View Full Version : Pure Codec
Extraterrestrial
18.11.10, 18:50
http://i54.tinypic.com/28sndwy.jpg
Decoder is a perfect person to achieve a variety of popular video, HDTV playback and encoding audio and video decoding versatile package comes with Media Player Classic, KMPlayer, BSPlayer three popular player, support Jane, platform installation of language, can play AVI, VCD, DVD, MPG, MP4, RMVB, TS, TP, EVO, M2TS, MKV, OGM, MOV, SCM, CSF, FLV and many other audio and video file formats. Recommended installation environment is Windows XP / Vista, Windows Media Player 11, does not support Windows 9X. And Realplayer to be used, please do not choose when to install Real decoding components, QuickTime similar.
Description:
20101022 -> 20101029
- Updated Media Player Classic Homecinema 1.4.2700.0
- Updated Media Player Classic Homecinema Standalone Filter 1.4.2700.0
- Update Daum PotPlayer 1.5 Build 25231
- Updated MediaInfo 0.7.36
- Adjust the ffdshow rev3562 20100907
- Integrated Real decoding components
http://soft1.wmzhe.com/PureCodec/WMZPureCodec20101029_Dio.exe
Nice bright icons:
http://i55.tinypic.com/296ci92.png
I've been using this software for months, It's even better than VLC.
http://i55.tinypic.com/211q8wh.png
If anybody knows a better settings or he/she is a codec geek, please share your knowledge with us.
I use codecs from this site .. sufficiently enough for me Shark007's FREE Codec solutions - Windows 7 codecs (http://shark007.net) and they enable playback of formats from 3gp to mp4 and avi and so on .. something I like about Shark007's FREE Codec solutions - Windows 7 codecs (http://shark007.net) codec packages is that you don't need to install separate players for each file type such as flv player for to play an flv file type etc.
it's the same player as KMPlayer, or not? see KMPlayer - Download (http://kmplayer.en.softonic.com/)
best regards
Aren't all codecs the same? I'm using latest CCCP and it works fine!
Extraterrestrial
18.11.10, 22:37
it's the same player as KMPlayer, or not? see KMPlayer - Download
best regards
Pure Codec let you choose between these players (Media Player Classic, The KMPlayer, Daum PotPlayer and Windows Media Player).
Regards.
thx, it's a lot of settings ;-) It isn't easy for Newbies ^^
for my german friends, I have the german language pack ;)
please copy the german.ini into the directory-->language
here the language File: 8676
It works just the same as KMPlayer
best regards
Extraterrestrial
19.11.10, 01:10
thx, it's a lot of settings ;-) It isn't easy for Newbies ^^
Most important settings are:
http://i56.tinypic.com/20mgif.png
1- for choosing different types of modes (codecs are chosen automatically).
2- for choosing the player you want.
The rest are for choosing renders, splitters and decoders manually, I'd love if anybody shares his knowledge for best viewing.
If you've messed a lot choosing and trying codecs, "Codecs Repair" option comes in handy and restores the program to it's factory settings.
http://i52.tinypic.com/2d7ecn9.png
Also, the File type associate tools is very useful:
http://i56.tinypic.com/erim3p.png
It's recommended to uninstall all kind of codecs and players except for VLC before installing Pure Codec to avoid conflict.
What is the difference between this [Pure Codec], KMPlayer, SMPlayer and VLC? Are the codecs in Pure Codec better than the internals ones in those players? What about CoreCodec?
Extraterrestrial
06.08.11, 21:41
What is the difference between this [Pure Codec], KMPlayer, SMPlayer and VLC? Are the codecs in Pure Codec better than the internals ones in those players? What about CoreCodec?
No one said it was better; afaik, VLC can also play almost everything but i don't like it. Pure Codec has alot of advantages ( see above i.e, new icons for each video extension unlike the crappy look of vlc icons ..etc).
I didn't try SMPlayer or KMPlayer so i can't talk about it.
afaik, VLC can also play almost everything but i don't like it. Pure Codec has alot of advantages ( see above i.e, new icons for each video extension unlike the crappy look of vlc icons ..etc).
That's just aesthetics, if that is the only difference.
You may want to check out The Best Video Player for Windows (http://lifehacker.com/5822672/the-best-video-player-for-windows)
i must admit that i don't like vlc either (on a windows machine, at least. On mac and linux is a different story). Personally I always go with the KLite codec pack. MPC is just lovely :]
VLC can't handle 1080p films. Other than that, it is a great player.
madashi video renderer
You mean madshi renderer (madvr)
Highly recommended! You can read everywhere its the best Codec/Renderer that exists.
Read more here:
Tutorial madVR - Configuration - HomeCinema-HD (http://www.homecinema-hd.com/madvr_en.html)
Also the german HDC-Tracker recommend madvr, and at HDC are all "quality enthusiast".
Why is madvr recommended? Is it because of its GPU assist?
Why is madvr recommended? Is it because it of GPU assist?
No
this ist the first version (as far as i know) which has GPU assist. Its made to bring the best possible Quality. It needs a High Power Computer to run smooth. The Quality has to do with "LUT" and a lot more parameters/stuff. Its all very technical, if you want more Informations, check the Link at bottom of this post.
- high quality chroma upsampling
- high quality scaling (bicubic, mitchell, lanczos, spline etc)
- high quality YCbCr -> RGB conversion
- gamut & gamma correction for display calibration
- full 16bit processing queue
- final 16bit processing result is dithered down to RGB output bitdepth
- bypasses graphics card's video (damage) algorithms
- all work is done via GPU shaders
- no shortcuts, highest quality has priority over anything else
READ (AND SEE) MORE HERE:
madVR - high quality video renderer (GPU assisted) - Doom9's Forum (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=146228) <----- Learn more here
and again the Link for configuration:
Tutorial madVR - Configuration - HomeCinema-HD (http://www.homecinema-hd.com/madvr_en.html)
Why is madvr recommended? Is it because of its GPU assist?
because of quality
because of quality
This is better than CoreCodec as well?
If you talking about CoreAVC:
CoreAVC´s goal is to be fast and have a low CPU consumption. In this case its highly developed.
When we talk about Quality, madvr is better. Madvr is much slower and needs extreme CPU-Power/GPU-Power.
Look at post #16:
highest quality has priority over anything else
All this codec talk is making me point out one very important aspect: your mileage my vary depending on your screen. I've noticed better quality with default MediaPlayer HC on a 50'' LCD TV than with madvr, and the reversed on the notebook screen and on the LCD monitor sitting on my desk.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.