View Full Version : Do you want a new thread for a second review?
Maybe you noticed that new reviews of already reviewed trackers are mostly posted in a new thread.
Till now we moved them to the existing review and put an extra link in the index list.
Now I would like you to decide if we should keep the current way of handling or if we should use a seperate thread for every review regardless of the fact that there is already one.
Of course there will still be every thread linked in the index list.
No we will have tooo many threads.Why not add a permalink(link to post)at the end of the first review?? Example:
First review
Updated review I by "SB-i member"
Updated review II by "SB-i member 2"
You mean a link at the end of the first review (first post) in the thread?
Yes that's what I meant.:wink:
A link in red or bigger size that everyone can see of course.
i'm the only who voted "Yes" :eek3:,
i voted yes because it'd more better, a new review can be organized by putting the date(ScT 2008) and ScT (2009)
also its more comfortable than scrolling down and viewing pages for new images.
I can't see the point in making reviews for trackers that were already reviewed.We should concentrate on trackers that don't have a review.
also its more comfortable than scrolling down and viewing pages for new images.Did you take a look at my ideahttp://www.sb-innovation.de/images/smilies/new/eek13.gif?
the only better thing of a newer review is that the pictures are more actual. if a tracker has 9.000 torrents and after half year 15.000 its a big change.
i suppose that its better to have it in one thread otherwise there is a lot of chaos and if its possible to do the newer review on the second post. so u can find it easier. if u find the newer review on the fifth page u wont look at it.
if an review is too old (think about a half year) if there is someone who post a new review the old one can be deleted. if no new one is here it should be deleted, of course.
kind regards
Dagon
Did you take a look at my ideaimage (http://www.sb-innovation.de/images/smilies/new/eek13.gif)?
sorry i didn't,
i suppose you're right with the links method :top:
I voted for "No", for the already mentioned reasons that it helps to keep up a solid structure and lowers the amount of new posts at the same time.
I don't see any problem in searching the newer review if, lets say, a link to new one is put under the original review. That way, everyone would know where to go for the new review.
And I suppose, it's really enough to update a review only, if the tracker went through major changes since the last review.
This would also help to keep the amount of posted reviews at a minimum.
Sorry if I repeated myself a bit, but it's late already and I wanted to clarify myself. :biggrin:
greetz vDD
I agree with vDD+wR.It doesen't make any sense to make double reviews if there aren't any major changes
No, keep it like it is
In the same thread we could have updates of the review
thecoolest
20.09.09, 18:51
as i think its gud...u can update review..again..& also with that..which rm,mratio,vuze mods works grt & perfect..info with it....so ppl read review..get the perfect idea..abt what to do & what to dl too..:D
i think either way would be fine but having seperate will help see what's the major different!
First of all it is better if users post new reviews - that would be lace for discussions instead what i have seen today, how do i feel and so on. Doing never once a year can be the place for new members to show their commitment and for veterans to show they are still on the field.
i think either way would be fine but having seperate will help see what's the major different!
Undecided? :tongue:
Just for the record, extra reviews are linked to in the index, for example:
700m.bz [II]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.